Actually regular Nick is extremely popular.
They have many popular pre-teen series.
Viacom to Rebrand Spike TV as Paramount Network
- Thread starter osu1991
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 30
- Views 11K
They have many popular pre-teen series.
Oh the days of The Nashville Network! Winston Cup racing from North Wilkesburough (sp).
The only constant is change.
The only constant is change.
I always get a kick out of these type posts.
Every member that has ever joined SatGuys could post their own "They could turn off ___________ and I wouldn't notice" and before long we'd have a list of every single channel that is available.
Thats why I posted what I did.I always get a kick out of these type posts.
Every member that has ever joined SatGuys could post their own "They could turn off ___________ and I wouldn't notice" and before long we'd have a list of every single channel that is available.
Just to show that those baseless comments can be said about every and all channels.
Most of those same people are the ones that say they don't care about the Viacom channels when dish was going to drop them, but yet they are the first ones to point out Vue doesn't have them, like its a huge downfall.
They were unique channels back in the 80's and 90's...but now they are all just Mish mash
Sent from my SM-G920V using the SatelliteGuys app!
Sent from my SM-G920V using the SatelliteGuys app!
This can work well IF Viacom is willing to spend serious $$$ for good quality, FRESH content. Similar to the SciFi turnaround, and Netflix and Amazon prove there are some creative people with really good ideas for content. Of course, the channel Viacom seems to do the least with, but has the the most potential is LOGO. What a complete waste of a channel that could have some of the most crazy, innovative, outlandish, creative, and entertaining programming. Too bad the BBC with The Graham Norton show, Doctor Who, along with programs in the spirit of The Thick of it, The League of Gentlemen, Psychoville, The Mighty Boosh and other shows in the spirit of Channel 4 programming like Green Wing, Moone Boy, and Spy (so much more Brit programming), and they Australia Danger 5 are far more true to what LOGO should be in spirit. And yes, KEEP Ru Paul because he is the only REAL thing on that channel and probably the only money maker for that channel with fresh episodes of drag racers.
Some more info on this Viacom "regroup":
http://www.multichannel.com/viacom-confronts-bundle-conundrum/410852
Viacom Confronts Bundle Conundrum
Giving up some pay TV cash could pay off with growth later
Viacom has seemingly taken the first meaningful move to break up its huge programming bundle, an action pay TV providers have been dreaming of for decades.
But while a newfound focus on six core brands might eventually unshackle distributors from being forced to pay for channels their customers don’t watch, Viacom must navigate a fine line between legacy pay TV providers and emerging virtual multichannel video programming distributors (vMVPDs) for the transition to be a success.
CEO Bob Bakish said Viacom will focus on a so-called “Flagship Six” of BET, Comedy Central, MTV, Nickelodeon, Nick Jr. and Paramount. Spike TV will be rebranded as The Paramount Network in 2018. Four other brands — VH1, CMT, Logo and TV Land — have been designated as “reinforcing” networks, flanking the core six.
Viacom’s remaining 15 networks, including the likes of MTV Classic, Nicktoons and Centric, will receive less emphasis.
Bakish has stressed that the channels will not disappear. But they won’t receive the same resources as the core six.
Most analysts believe the non-core channels will eventually go away.
Programmers like Viacom and NBCUniversal — which recently shuttered its Cloo and Esquire networks — are coming to the realization that the days of reaping additional affiliate fees and ad revenue with marginal channels of essentially repurposed content are over. In the current skinny-bundle universe, less is indeed more.
Emerging virtual MVPDs, actively targeting Viacom’s core millennial audience, will play a role in the changes. Bakish said a key part of his five-point turnaround plan for Viacom will be better managing those relationships, limiting deals with over-the-top providers to its library content while supporting vMVPDs like Sling TV and DirecTV Now by embracing “their roles as catalysts of innovation.”
But Bakish also expressed a desire to deepen relationships with existing MVPDs, a move MoffettNathanson senior research analyst Michael Nathanson saw as perhaps a path to more sensible negotiations in the future. “Maybe we will also see an end to the jamming of commercial loads and SVOD deals simply to make quarterly numbers,” Nathanson wrote.
Viacom will have to carefully waIk the line between legacy MVPDs and emerging virtual MVPDs, according to one analyst.
“By creating effectively a two-tier system for its networks and potentially allowing for a smaller set to be carried on vMVPDs like Hulu puts legacy distributors at an effective disadvantage,” Barclays media analyst Kannan Venkateshwar wrote in a client note.
But the impact may be lessened, depending on how the programmer handles its “reinforcing” networks.
Credit Suisse media analyst Omar Sheikh estimated that the four reinforcing networks contribute about 15% of total revenue and cash flow, meaning that absent the other channels, Viacom would only have to grow its top 10 networks by 3.5% annually to deliver the same profit.
Viacom has some time to pull it off. The company doesn’t have any big affiliate fee renewals until fiscal year 2018, which could give it nine more months to work out the kinks, noted Telsey Advisory Group media analyst Tom Eagan.
“The question is whether Viacom can enhance the value of its brands (in ratings and engagement) before the next round of renewals,” Eagan said in a research note.
http://www.multichannel.com/viacom-confronts-bundle-conundrum/410852
Viacom Confronts Bundle Conundrum
Giving up some pay TV cash could pay off with growth later
Viacom has seemingly taken the first meaningful move to break up its huge programming bundle, an action pay TV providers have been dreaming of for decades.
But while a newfound focus on six core brands might eventually unshackle distributors from being forced to pay for channels their customers don’t watch, Viacom must navigate a fine line between legacy pay TV providers and emerging virtual multichannel video programming distributors (vMVPDs) for the transition to be a success.
CEO Bob Bakish said Viacom will focus on a so-called “Flagship Six” of BET, Comedy Central, MTV, Nickelodeon, Nick Jr. and Paramount. Spike TV will be rebranded as The Paramount Network in 2018. Four other brands — VH1, CMT, Logo and TV Land — have been designated as “reinforcing” networks, flanking the core six.
Viacom’s remaining 15 networks, including the likes of MTV Classic, Nicktoons and Centric, will receive less emphasis.
Bakish has stressed that the channels will not disappear. But they won’t receive the same resources as the core six.
Most analysts believe the non-core channels will eventually go away.
Programmers like Viacom and NBCUniversal — which recently shuttered its Cloo and Esquire networks — are coming to the realization that the days of reaping additional affiliate fees and ad revenue with marginal channels of essentially repurposed content are over. In the current skinny-bundle universe, less is indeed more.
Emerging virtual MVPDs, actively targeting Viacom’s core millennial audience, will play a role in the changes. Bakish said a key part of his five-point turnaround plan for Viacom will be better managing those relationships, limiting deals with over-the-top providers to its library content while supporting vMVPDs like Sling TV and DirecTV Now by embracing “their roles as catalysts of innovation.”
But Bakish also expressed a desire to deepen relationships with existing MVPDs, a move MoffettNathanson senior research analyst Michael Nathanson saw as perhaps a path to more sensible negotiations in the future. “Maybe we will also see an end to the jamming of commercial loads and SVOD deals simply to make quarterly numbers,” Nathanson wrote.
Viacom will have to carefully waIk the line between legacy MVPDs and emerging virtual MVPDs, according to one analyst.
“By creating effectively a two-tier system for its networks and potentially allowing for a smaller set to be carried on vMVPDs like Hulu puts legacy distributors at an effective disadvantage,” Barclays media analyst Kannan Venkateshwar wrote in a client note.
But the impact may be lessened, depending on how the programmer handles its “reinforcing” networks.
Credit Suisse media analyst Omar Sheikh estimated that the four reinforcing networks contribute about 15% of total revenue and cash flow, meaning that absent the other channels, Viacom would only have to grow its top 10 networks by 3.5% annually to deliver the same profit.
Viacom has some time to pull it off. The company doesn’t have any big affiliate fee renewals until fiscal year 2018, which could give it nine more months to work out the kinks, noted Telsey Advisory Group media analyst Tom Eagan.
“The question is whether Viacom can enhance the value of its brands (in ratings and engagement) before the next round of renewals,” Eagan said in a research note.
