It's probably not working as it should. I'd rather wait for them to fix any bugs than having them turn it on with bugs.
That's interesting. If I recall correctly, they previously had the 211 slated for the update ahead of the 222.
As long as it has taken to add this feature (which should be a relatively simple porting of code from other receivers) leads me to believe that Dish either: 1) not actively pursuing this feature due to disinterest on their part, or 2) they have not employed sufficient coders to accomplish this task. Either way, it does not bode well for the 211/222 receivers.
My guess is that it would canibalize DVR sales. Encription isn't a concern, otherwise we wouldn't see external HDD's on the 622/722.I don't believe it's possible that code is holding up this feature.
I'm certain that the holdup is in the executive suite.
Maybe lawyers who fear blow-back from content providers who think their copywrite'd material will end up in the "napster" universe.
Or they have already been put on notice that the encryption had better be super hack proof and this means Charlie has to cough up serious do-ray-me to buy license some big time encryption system.
Or marketing has issues when possible loss of sales of DVRs.
So what, Charlie can't walk and chew gum at the same time?It is just not a priority project.
Whoa there.I don't think content dispersal is an issue either because DirecTV is beta testing the ability to transfer HD video to your PC, just like TiVo and DirecTiVo have done for years.
Whoa there.
Are you saying there is a device from Direct or TiVo in service right now that puts HD program material on a PC? I could believe SD but HD, not so much.
What is the point of this device? Can the PC view the material or is the PC just a storage device for secure encrypted data?
Final point: There is a difference between demonstrating a technology via beta testing and actually selling it to the public. The Vip211 EHD is exhibit A. Folks here have seen it run at some show or another.