And their cheating is legendary. Bear was a master of that, and the reason my team left the SEC in disgust (though I wish that hadn't, but unfortunately Bobby Dodd had values).No. They reside in the same state as my team.
And their cheating is legendary. Bear was a master of that, and the reason my team left the SEC in disgust (though I wish that hadn't, but unfortunately Bobby Dodd had values).No. They reside in the same state as my team.
I seem to recall many a Auburn fan claiming to be national champs in 04, and would take this one with a sense of vindication if they could. (I am pretty sure the school even acknowledges an 04 title in the media guide)Auburn fan here. Could give a rats ass if they award that BCS championship. No Auburn fan that I know would or ever will claim it.
I know some schools that claim many championships would take it in a heart beat.
And their cheating is legendary. Bear was a master of that, and the reason my team left the SEC in disgust (though I wish that hadn't, but unfortunately Bobby Dodd had values).
msmith198025 said:I seem to recall many a Auburn fan claiming to be national champs in 04, and would take this one with a sense of vindication if they could. (I am pretty sure the school even acknowledges an 04 title in the media guide)
I wouldnt really blame them either, they IMO, got hosed.
They earned it 13 times on the field and didn't lose a single game. Including winning its BCS bowl game.
Auburn was really good that year, and could have taken them. Unfortunately they started out the pre-season poll way down (another reason they should start polling mid-year), and didn't have a chance to work into the game.Any team that would've played USC that year for the BCS title had no chance. USC, violations aside, had a team above and beyond the rest. It will be a vacated title, that's all. I can't think of anyone wanting it by default (well, yes I can but I won't be an ahole and say who).
Oklahoma was really good that year too. USC was better.Auburn was really good that year, and could have taken them. Unfortunately they started out the pre-season poll way down (another reason they should start polling mid-year), and didn't have a chance to work into the game.
Same could be said about Utah, but I don't think they could have beat USC.
And yet another good reason to have a 16 team playoff like every other football division in the NCAA.
How else can they "punish" ? Enforcing sanctions later on isn't fair to the current team, players, coaches, etc, but they don't have any other realistic options.
The NCAA fine a private individual ? Good luck with that.... Press criminal charges ? What law was broken ?
But, there were no laws broken, only rules set up by the NCAA that their members are supposed to adhere to....Fraud would be my guess and quite possibly the only thing that could be the charge.
But, there were no laws broken, only rules set up by the NCAA that their members are supposed to adhere to....
You want the US gov't (would have to be federal law) to enact laws related to college athletics ? You want the gov't involved AT ALL ?very true...maybe laws should be made....
Hall said:You want the US gov't (would have to be federal law) to enact laws related to college athletics ? You want the gov't involved AT ALL ?
When Vanessa Williams was dethroned by the Miss America Pageant people back in 1984, they crowned the runner up, Suzette Charles.
I can see them relabeling the trophy for Michigan with an asterisk.
Not really, many made the case (myself included) that they had an easy schedule as the Big 12 was really light on defense, and the previous year LSU showed that an SEC defense had no trouble shutting down Oklahoma's offense.Oklahoma was really good that year too. USC was better.
Not really, many made the case (myself included) that they had an easy schedule as the Big 12 was really light on defense, and the previous year LSU showed that an SEC defense had no trouble shutting down Oklahoma's offense.