Come on, let's put this in perspective...
*IF* this alleged price increase actually happens, you have a legitimate beef with DISH . . .
Your big *IF* depends upon how vigorous those of us with 4-6 HD DVR's/Boxes let Dish know through this forum and via emails what we think of Dish's test balloon (Please, this was intentionally leaked by Dish to test the waters) regarding the possible fee restructuring will slam those of us who are AEP with a lot of HD DVR's. So, if this fee restructuring is somehow altered for the better, it is because of us who do get worked up and let Dish know our sentiments rather than your method laying prostrate willing to let Dish stick it to us.
Finally, if you are not an AEP with at least 4-6 HD DVR's and boxes, then you really have no business telling any of US not to get worked up. So far, the only ones who have expressed the Pollyanna, reefer induced, "chill-out, man," attitude have been those with only a few boxes and below AEP. Considering that the talked about fee restructure may result in even a buck or two savings for some subs with one or two boxes, good for them. I am really happy for them. But that means that this possible fee restructure and it's effect on high-end, high HD box, AEP + other services subscribers really doesn't concern them and their calls to sit back and wait sounds about as irrational as you may view our vigor in letting Dish know through this forum and emails or other methods that we don't like what MAY come, and we are wise to scream and doom and gloom about it because facing a possible $30 + increase on the monthly bill is something to scream about. Since you are so relaxed, please take a nap while the rest of us facing over a 20% increase in our bills discuss how this affects US. Over a $30 per month increase that works out to over a 20% increase in the monthly bill for AEP, high-end, high number HD DVR and boxes: how's that for putting it "in perspective." A rhetorical question because I already know and don't care for your answer.
You missed my point...
I was pointing out the absurdity of getting upset with the CEO account for not responding to the poster. For CEO to respond would confirm the "rumor", which Dish is obviously not ready to do, especially to those that are so vocal about it. Did you seriously expect a response?
I was NOT suggesting that anyone didn't have reason to get upset!
As for your other comments about those who don't have AEP (which I don't, but I do have multiple receivers), it is somewhat offensive that you would just assume that if you don't have AEP, then you are not affected. Perhaps you should be reminded that many who don't have AEP would like to have it but already can't afford it, perhaps barely being able to pay for a basic package. Any increase, no matter how minute, may be the difference between having service or not having service. Granted, if the rate increases, as rumored, are accurate, then those with AEP and multiple receivers will bear what would seem to be an unfair brunt of the increase (perhaps Charlie figures if you have enough disposable income to pay for AEP and multiple receivers then you can afford the higher rates) BUT don't assume that the rumored increase won't hit others hard as well.
Now, with that off my chest, here's another wild, random thought...
Could there be any reason that Charlie might DELIBERATELY be trying to reduce the number of AEP subscribers? Maybe in preparation for some kind of ala carte packages that could generate more subscription revenue but less payout to the programmers?