I would agree with out but AT&T just signed a long term agreement with Raycom to get their stations back on UVerseTV. Which I don't understand why they did that when it does look like AT&T wants to get rid of UVerseTV and shift the UVerseTV customers over DTV. I wonder if AT&T considered that instead of merging the two systems that they found is was cheaper and better just to shift the UVerseTV customers over to DTV?
AT&T has had DirecTV since 2015. It was in July of that year. So, it's not quite a full period of two years.
I think AT&T intends for U-verse to be gone. But, at this point, it's not easy to estimate when AT&T can get that to happen. But, AT&T wants DirecTV to be the television platform. Delivering on true high-speed Internet (now defined by the FCC in download speed as a minimum of 25Mbps) will be the real challenge. Delivering a footprint (not merely in select areas, like in the south) which is consistent in wiring Internet beyond these small 6 or 12 or 18 numbers (which are the numbers in my area, the market of Detroit, Michigan), when competitors are 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, and even a GB or more...that is a reason for AT&T to get rid of U-verse in favor of DirecTV when it can get the customers to migrate.
There will be U-verse subscribers who will refuse. Some will not have a choice. Some will have a choice...and they will choose to go elsewhere. But, AT&T can't cater to their personal needs at the sacrifice of its millions of other customers and the infrastructure it determines it needs.
My guess is that, 10 years from now, U-verse will not exist. (It may not take that many years. But, we won't be mentioning U-verse in 2027 unless we happen to want to talk about the past.)
As a longtime DirecTV subscriber, I want AT&T to upgrade the standard definition programmers to high definition. I don't feel there is value to most of what AT&T has added in high definition, since 2015, with exceptions for what little it added of those which were already carried by DirecTV in standard definition.