I think it's extortion and greed on the part of the stations, pure and simple. They're in a position to negotiate and they do so. Right or wrong, they're capitalizing on their ability to take providers to the cleaners. I agree with the posters who say that the nets should cover the areas that they're supposed to cover; their primary responsibility is to be OTA services, right? It's said that the new NBC O&O in Boston doesn't even cover all of Boston proper. These stations ARE acting like they dont care about their signal penetration anymore. They can blame the DTV transition for some of the reception issues people have. They aren't allowed to broadcast with more than a million watts of power, so covering more than 70-80 miles reliably well is really tough. But if they aren't broadcasting at max power and claiming to cover areas they should be, that's wrong IMO. Sounds like the only way to get around some of these issues is with the FCC
Sent from my iPhone using the SatelliteGuys app!
Sent from my iPhone using the SatelliteGuys app!