Fantastic
It is. I bought 1200 shares of tivo stock friday. I plan on taking the profits in the next few days.
Fantastic
Does this mean that the subs with these 192+k units will no longer be able to use these units as a DVR?Defendants are hereby FURTHER ORDERED to, within thirty (30) days of the issuance
of this order, disable the DVR functionality (i.e., disable all storage to and playback from a hard disk drive of television data) in all but 192,708 units of the Infringing Products that have been placed with an end-user or subscriber. The DVR functionality, storage to and playback from a hard disk drive, shall not be enabled in any new placements of the Infringing Products.
I suspect those will be the subject of a new contempt motion very soon.
Even if the newer models are not under the same criteria, it will still cost E* a lot if they give away free equipment.The next contempt hearing were be on the newer models. The chances are that they use the same infringed processes. Charlie would be throwing good money after bad.
What is different about the older models that makes them be in violation, yet the newer models not be in violation?TiVo has had years now to add them to the list, or at least start the process of trying to get them declared the same as infringing. They have refrained to date. Not saying they will not in the future, but one wonders why they have not done so to date. Friends that have had the infringing units have had them replaced by Dish with 622s for free in the past 6 months. Dish seems to have been working on the phase out, Dish called them and offered a free update.
It's the other way around. The people with the 192,000 excused units get to keep using them. The rest of the named models can't record TV signals any more. It is not known whether this means they will go black. They may not be able to display a picture that has not been recorded on the hard drive first.Does this mean that the subs with these 192+k units will no longer be able to use these units as a DVR?
The newer models weren't in existence at the time of the 2006 trial. A contempt hearing will be needed to determine the starus of the newer models.What is different about the older models that makes them be in violation, yet the newer models not be in violation?
Duhhh...It's the other way around. The people with the 192,000 excused units get to keep using them. The rest of the named models can't record TV signals any more. It is not known whether this means they will go black. They may not be able to display a picture that has not been recorded on the hard drive first.
But yet, what the lawsuit entailed is also prevalent in the newer models?The newer models weren't in existence at the time of the 2006 trial. A contempt hearing will be needed to determine the starus of the newer models.
But yet, what the lawsuit entailed is also prevalent in the newer models?
Dish was enjoined from making DVRs that are not more than colorably different from the adjudicated named DVRs. The contempt hearing they just had covered the allegedly modified named models. Another contempt hearing will be needed for the newer models.But yet, what the lawsuit entailed is also prevalent in the newer models?
Well TiVo stock started marching higher again, now up 41%+. I wonder how long until press releases come out.
ALVISO, Calif., June 2 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ --TiVo Inc. (Nasdaq: TIVO), the creator of and a leader in television products and services for digital video recorders (DVR), offered the following statement today regarding the decision by the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, in the lawsuit against EchoStar Communications Corporation:
"We are extremely gratified by the Court's well reasoned and thorough decision, in which it rejected EchoStar's attempted workaround claim regarding the TiVo patent, found EchoStar to be in contempt of court and ordered the permanent injunction fully enforced.
In addition, the Court's award of an additional $103 million plus interest through April 2008 makes this victory all the more important. EchoStar may attempt to further delay this case but we are very pleased the Court has made it clear that there are major ramifications for continued infringement."
jacmyoung, where are you? Helloooo??
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
A federal court in Texas ruled for TiVo Inc. (TIVO) in a lawsuit against EchoStar Communications Corp., now part of Dish Network Corp. (DISH), and TiVo shares shot up 39% to $9.73 in after-hours trading.
The digital-recording-technology company said the court rejected EchoStar's attempted workaround claim regarding its patent, found EchoStar to be in contempt of court and ordered the permanent injunction fully enforced.
...
Did I miss where TiVo filed suit regarding subsequent models?The next contempt hearing were be on the newer models.
Did I miss where TiVo filed suit regarding subsequent models?