Okay Ramses II!!
LET MY PEOPLE GO!
Your point is that singers should sing the anthem as written and never ever deviate from the exact written sheet-music because the anthem is a unique song and there is nothing else like it to stand for and represent the United states, right?
Is that your point?
I GET IT!
I don't agree with it!
Part one: The singers should sing the notes exactly as written on the sheet music because to deviate from that, you corrupt the original song and its impact.
Now any time more than one person sings in harmony, they are deviating from the original music! Any time any one does the octive-shift on the word FREE, any time you have a chorus, you have a variation on your music.
My point that you missed was that there are no two RENDITIONS that are the same. They may be similar, but no two are the same. Even if it's the same artist singing or playing the same song, the tempo, the intensity, the life of the music is different each and every time!
Some one mentioned earlier that Whitney Houston's superbowl performance what the best ever. It was excellent, but it did not stay true to the sheet music. The phrasing was different. The notes she chose to sing were not on the sheet music.
Any time you hear a chorus sing the anthem, there is extreme deviation from the sheet music.
The difference is that there are some deviations that go beyond what many like and that is a matter of taste! Jimmy Hendrix's version of the national anthem was reviled but the "older" generation. We, who are now the older generation, consider it "our" national anthem.
MY POINT: Your favorite rendition of the national anthem is a RENDITION of the song and not a transcription of the sheet music!
As to part 2: There is nothing else like The Star Spangled Banner to stand for and represent the United states.
Three words: "America the Beautiful"
(Different lyrics to "God Save the King/Queen" from England.)
See ya
Tony