The local stations would still have a monopoly in the "core" of their market, where the vast majority of the population in their market lives. I was only talking about opening up the fringes of the market (where it is harder to get OTA reception) to competition via satellite, just like the local affiliates already face competition from out-of-market affiliates on the local cable systems in those areas.Then the local stations would loose their leverage with the carriers.
If their signal can be replaced with a similar one, nobody negotiates, just go with the alternate.
This is just exactly the opposite of the local monopolies now created for stations.
Iknow we abhor monopolies, but we either keep the monopoly model we have had for for over 70 years or we tear it up an open all DNA's to "let the big dog win".
Small stations have enough trouble generating revenue without carriers being able to substitute an outside signal on them.
Well, my proposal would go both ways: when Dish (or any other provider) negotiates to carry a local station, they would be required to negotiate for carriage in the entire area where the station can legally be offered, including the out-of-market Significantly Viewed areas.They don't because then Dish would have to pay the nickel or what ever other extortion fee the providers want to carry that station.
If the provider was only required to pay for the channels in the DMA, and got the significant viewed channels for free this would not be an issue.