Its always the same, so im not going to argue. You guys continue to support a dying format.
BR may be on the rise, but the truth is that HD adoption is still slow. I don't doubt the consumer's ability to make the choice that will screw them. For me it's all about cost-benefit ratio. Right now HD-DVD provides this.
Ok, so HDDVD is touting a 51gb disc. Lets not forget TDK's 100gig BR recordable. Once again, inferior format. Why support limited storage. This goes beyond the movies, but all HDDVD guys can counter with it is "its plenty of space". Maybe as far as movies are concerned.
It's all about movies. I don't care what the disc capacity is, as long as the quality of the movie and its features are great. Why should I care about storage capacity when harddrives and flash memory are going cheaper and cheaper? Why will I need to store 50 or 100 GB discs of data? I don't have the time to be archiving data, much less the time to be amassing such [illegal] data over newsgroups. I especially don't have time to burn and reburn BD-RW's as if they were harddrives. If I need to back my data up to mutliple DVD-R's, it's not as if I'll be doing it frequently enough to warrant buying an expensive BD drive and media!
Knowing a 51gig hddvd disc is coming and a 100gig br disc is coming. If you were buying a new pc, would you get a br rw drive or a hddvd rw drive. Im sure youll say hddvd which does not surprise me.
I would get neither. There isn't a significant advantage to larger optical media storage. Again, I can burn multiple DVD-R's for way less in terms of both hardware and discs. Faster as well.
The blockbuster comment was opinion, from what ive seen in the forums. Plus Netflix just had its sub count go in the negative direction. Coincidence? I switched to BB online from Netflix when they made the announcement to go Blu.
Netflix still carries a better selection. They also carry blu-ray. Doesn't really make sense that you switched just because of the Blu-ray store announcement. Unless you're referring to the Total Access part of the program, which might make some sense. It isn't clear what you mean by this.
Now of course, the Target announcement is only "minor", thats the standard answer for the HDDVD camp. Lets see how Joe Blow takes it reading the papers today and when he's in Target doing his christmas shopping.
I don't think it is minor. In fact, I see blu taking some major steps ahead hd-dvd. I may favor the HDDVD technology for its practical approach and quality, but I'm not so rabid in my support that I can't detect negative news when its right in front of me. But I seem to remember the BD camp doing the same thing when the MPEG-2 encodes were giving the tech a bad name, or the unfinished BD spec. The 'fanatics' will always spin the news to make it look favorable for their 'side'.
As far as HDDVD equipment being superior, I feel the Samsung BD-P1200 is one of the best units out now. Lets forget you have the 3rd gen Samsung coming soon and Denons new nice piece of equipment. Whats Toshiba doing?
They don't need to do much. The XA-2 is still regarded as one of the best hi-def players on the market. Period.
Target did not make the decision to exclusively support BR hardware, but they did make the decision ON THEIR OWN to support BR standalones in the store.
I consider the BB and the Target decision as wins for the BD supporters. I just can't figure out why people are all about BD. Storage is a moot point. Studio support is a moot point (Consumer-base should dictate studio support, not the other way around). HDDVD offers the same or better movie product (HDi is complete spec) for less of a price. Supporting BD is almost like arguing that Monster Cable is pro-consumer.