So why isn't the entire NAB in prison for racketeering? I suppose for the same reason the judges aren't in a mental institution for not being able to adapt to reality.
For God's sake the NAB should be in prison for greed and corruption IMHO.
So why isn't the entire NAB in prison for racketeering? I suppose for the same reason the judges aren't in a mental institution for not being able to adapt to reality.
Because without the NAB none of these guys in office would have been elected.So why isn't the entire NAB in prison for racketeering? I suppose for the same reason the judges aren't in a mental institution for not being able to adapt to reality.
So why isn't the entire NAB in prison for racketeering? I suppose for the same reason the judges aren't in a mental institution for not being able to adapt to reality.
Because without the NAB none of these guys in office would have been elected.
Politicians need the support of the media or they are not politicians anymore.
Posted Via The FREE SatelliteGuys Reader App!
Actually aereo could save the broadcast industry by providing more access to signals that were meant to be free..they just need to learn how to sell advertising in a online environmentMy comment agrees with the court that the case doesn't restrict innovation as much as it's being made out.
I don't even think that Aereo is all that innovative as it relies on dying broadcast networks. Viewers continue to abandon these networks in favor of cable networks who are producing content people actually want to watch.
I don't think it'd work that way. They are still "selling" a service. They are rebroadcasting a signal, which SCOTUS rules they have no rights to. It'd be like you letting people watch the NFL on Fox at your house, but charging people to watch it. Not legal.Actually aereo could save the broadcast industry by providing more access to signals that were meant to be free..they just need to learn how to sell advertising in a online environment
Posted Via The FREE SatelliteGuys Reader App!
I meant the broadcasters working with aereo could become more profitable by perfecting a free distribution model based on ads..supreme court shot down DVR service not streamingI don't think it'd work that way. They are still "selling" a service. They are rebroadcasting a signal, which SCOTUS rules they have no rights to. It'd be like you letting people watch the NFL on Fox at your house, but charging people to watch it. Not legal.
I hope this inspires a new generation of DTVPal DVR type devices. The ruling seems to allow for that. You just can't have OTA PROGRAMMING streamed. An OTA dvr plus perhaps adding in Netflix and Hulu. Maybe even the ability to download Amazon programming to the hard drive.
Yeah, that's a Tivo, but their fees are out of this world for plain OTA listings.
I don't think it'd work that way. They are still "selling" a service. They are rebroadcasting a signal, which SCOTUS rules they have no rights to. It'd be like you letting people watch the NFL on Fox at your house, but charging people to watch it. Not legal.
TIVO with lifetime. A $300-500 solution, which is 3-6 months of that cable bill.
Got over it. But yesterday was Black Wednesday as I call this on SCOTUS controversial decision to kill Aereo and give cord-cutters real nightmares.
Corporate Greed and Corruption of the NAB still lives on sadly.
Retransmission Consent must be ABOLISHED because it's killing diversity and real local news. And the dire warnings from SNL Kagan that Retrans fees will go up billions by years to come. America has been screwed! I hate to say this.
More than that. Lifetime Tivo subscriptions are $500 alone, plus at least $200 for the equipment. $700 at least. Plus, no ability to download rather than stream Amazon shows for those of us with slow internet connections.