The other day a friend and I were discussing the differences between sat and cable. He has cable and really likes it/ He'd kinda like to have sat. that's when another friend stopped by and that's when things got interesting.
Me = well me
cableguy = friend who currently has cable
IT guy = networking guru
cableguy is interested in sat but appt manager said nope
IT guy said FCC says they can't do that but can place heavy restrictions on installation
Anyway the story got really interesting when I said that sat offer 100% digital signal while cable offers only some digital the rest are analog but they sell it as 100% digital (I started to sound like the DirecTV rep I talked to when I ordered my service). cableguy said that cable is 100% and DirecTV rep was lying.
That's when IT guy called us both idiots and told us this (hope I get it all right):
GEO, MEO, and LEO sats signals are analog
broaband coaxial cable (the type of medium not the marketing term broadband) signals are also analog. Then there was some stuff about broadband coax and baseband and well back to the story.
Niether one offers a digital signal. He says that the problem is that many people confuse the terms data and signal. In reality they both offer digital data modulated onto an analog signal (I think that's it).
As for the cable companies it's both. Cable is a "shared medium" or something. Then he got way too technical talking about channels and frequencies and trying to explaining why HBO is ch17 on a TV without a dig cable box and 300-to whatever with a digital cable box.
Do sat providers (talking about Charlie Ergen (sp) and other CEO bigwigs not retail monkeys) really think there aren't people that know better? Are they stupid? Are are they misleading the public with shoddy marketing tactics?
Me = well me
cableguy = friend who currently has cable
IT guy = networking guru
cableguy is interested in sat but appt manager said nope
IT guy said FCC says they can't do that but can place heavy restrictions on installation
Anyway the story got really interesting when I said that sat offer 100% digital signal while cable offers only some digital the rest are analog but they sell it as 100% digital (I started to sound like the DirecTV rep I talked to when I ordered my service). cableguy said that cable is 100% and DirecTV rep was lying.
That's when IT guy called us both idiots and told us this (hope I get it all right):
GEO, MEO, and LEO sats signals are analog
broaband coaxial cable (the type of medium not the marketing term broadband) signals are also analog. Then there was some stuff about broadband coax and baseband and well back to the story.
Niether one offers a digital signal. He says that the problem is that many people confuse the terms data and signal. In reality they both offer digital data modulated onto an analog signal (I think that's it).
As for the cable companies it's both. Cable is a "shared medium" or something. Then he got way too technical talking about channels and frequencies and trying to explaining why HBO is ch17 on a TV without a dig cable box and 300-to whatever with a digital cable box.
Do sat providers (talking about Charlie Ergen (sp) and other CEO bigwigs not retail monkeys) really think there aren't people that know better? Are they stupid? Are are they misleading the public with shoddy marketing tactics?