Stackable switches

  • Like
Reactions: raydio
Would you not have to ensure the Diseqc 1.1 command is sent first to 'open' port 5 before the Diseqc 1.0 command is sent, otherwise there's no way for the 1.0 command to reach its destination?

I have successfully cascaded comitted and uncommited switches and vice-versa, using both a MicroHD receiver and a DVB card.
yes I agree, that makes sense. I just don't see any control for that in the receiver, unless I'm missing something.
 
This is why I love tuner cards / USB. Software with user settings allow cascading sequence to be set for any cascading order required to establish the signal path.

Enigma2 images also offer greater user adjustable settings with 22KHz / DiSEqC commands.
 
Brct203 :
So the question is in your setup with Rec -- 1.1 switch -- 1.0 switch -- LNBs:

When you switch to 5/8 and 2/4 (as in your example), where is the output voltage measurable? Is it on port 1 of the 1.1 switch, or port 1 of the 1.0 switch? Or somewhere else?

Greetz,
A33
 
Brct203 :
So the question is in your setup with Rec -- 1.1 switch -- 1.0 switch -- LNBs:

When you switch to 5/8 and 2/4 (as in your example), where is the output voltage measurable? Is it on port 1 of the 1.1 switch, or port 1 of the 1.0 switch? Or somewhere else?

Greetz,
A33
well, that's definitely a good question. I have not checked. I will check that in the next few days

Thanks
 
In order to dig a bit further in this Diseqc stacking/cascading troubleshooting, I'm considering building the Arduino-based Diseqc decoder that KE4EST published in 2016.

Arduino DiSEqC Decoder

Michael, I'm a bit confused as to what pins to use on the Arduino, as your diagram shows "Out to Arduino X1-1 and X1-2".

I'm guessing that the section around the LM567 is optional and is only to detect if the receiver is sending the 22kHz tone (not as part of Diseqc protocol). Also I'm guessing that the part with the 7805 is only there to power the circuitry from the 13V/18V power coming from the receiver. Am I correct? I'm not sure what the X2 connection to Arduino is for...

thanks in advance!
 
Ah, that would be a nice-to-have, a diseqc decoder! :)
To easily check diseqc command order (do motor-commands get sent before or after diseqc 1.1/1.0 commands?),
to check raw diseqc commands (there are, for instance, two sets of GotoX motor command types, see here: USALS/ GotoX; Raw diseqc commands ),
or just to play with..... ;)

As with your setup, the diseqc commands don't seem to be the problem, I think, as with the other switch left out the one switch always functions right.

Have you tried this test already?
When you switch to 5/8 and 2/4 (as in your example), where is the output voltage measurable? Is it on port 1 of the 1.1 switch, or port 1 of the 1.0 switch? Or somewhere else?

If voltage on 1.1 switch, port 1: then the 1.1 switch did reset.
If voltage on 1.0 switch, port 1: then the 1.0 switch stayed/switched to default, so maybe the command didn't reach the switch.

greetz,
A33
 
Ah, that would be a nice-to-have, a diseqc decoder! :)
To easily check diseqc command order (do motor-commands get sent before or after diseqc 1.1/1.0 commands?),
to check raw diseqc commands (there are, for instance, two sets of GotoX motor command types, see here: USALS/ GotoX; Raw diseqc commands ),
or just to play with..... ;)

As with your setup, the diseqc commands don't seem to be the problem, I think, as with the other switch left out the one switch always functions right.

Have you tried this test already?


If voltage on 1.1 switch, port 1: then the 1.1 switch did reset.
If voltage on 1.0 switch, port 1: then the 1.0 switch stayed/switched to default, so maybe the command didn't reach the switch.

greetz,
A33
An initial test (connecting 4 LEDs to the cascaded 1.0 switch) indicates that it's getting the commands properly, and switches to the correct port. But the problems start after that, when switching back and forth. I need to make a more systematic test and document each step, and hopefully that will help find a pattern.
 
So, maybe you have the problem that the 1.0 switch sometimes is still busy with the starting up (after getting initial power from the switching of the 1.1 switch), and while starting up is not receiving the command to switch to port 2/3/4?
In that case: Is the problem gone when you switch first to port1 of the diseqc 1.0 switch, and only then to a port 2/3/4?

(just to try a lucky shot...)

Greetz,
A33
 
ok, so this is the test I did:

connected the 1.1 9-port switch to the Amiko, then hooked up red LEDs (with a resistor) to each inputs of the 1.1 switch, then connected port 4 to the output of the 1.0 switch, with yellow LEDs to its 4 inputs - see the picture.

with DiSEqC 1.0 set to "Disable" and using DiSEqC 1.1 port selection, I can switch through the 8 ports, no problem. When on Port4, Port 1 of the DiSEqc 1.0 also lights up, as one would expect (as it defaults to port 1).

If I set the receiver to DiSEqc 1.1 port 4 and then select a port other than 1 for DiSEqc 1.0, sometimes it work, sometimes the matching LED blinks for about 1/10th of a second, and then changes to DiSEqc 1.1 port 8 .

When it has jumped to port 8, even though the receiver is still set to DiSEqc 1.1 port 4 and DiSEqc 1.0 port 2 (or 3 or 4), if I leave it on DiSEqc 1.1 port4 and then change DiSEqc 1.0 to "disabled" and back to a port, then it's back to normal on that port. But then if I change the DiSEqc 1.0 port, there's a good chance that it will flip again to light up only the LED for DiSEqc 1.1 port 8. Are you confused yet?

so my take is that the DiSEqc 1.1 switch is not liking what the receiver sends when it changes a DiSEqc 1.0 port. Now the $100 question: is the problem with what the receiver is sending, or is the switch not reading a proper chain of DiSEqc commands?

That's what I'm hoping that the DiSEqc analyzer might help answering
 

Attachments

  • Diseqc test.pdf
    2.1 KB · Views: 216
  • IMG_3501.jpg
    IMG_3501.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 180
  • Like
Reactions: a33
Brct203 , Several years ago Magic Static gifted a DiSEqC reader that he had built. I would be happy to short-term loan it to you for your testing. :)

I use it frequently and must put out another BIG THANK YOU to Magic Static for an awesome testing tool that I often use on the bench!
Hi Brian, thank you very much for the offer! Let me try first to see if I can get the Arduino one together and working (I already have a few Arduino boards). If not, I'll happily take you up on your offer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: comfortably_numb
When it has jumped to port 8, even though the receiver is still set to DiSEqc 1.1 port 4 and DiSEqc 1.0 port 2 (or 3 or 4), if I leave it on DiSEqc 1.1 port4 and then change DiSEqc 1.0 to "disabled" and back to a port, then it's back to normal on that port. But then if I change the DiSEqc 1.0 port, there's a good chance that it will flip again to light up only the LED for DiSEqc 1.1 port 8. Are you confused yet?

Good testing! And yes, I am a bit confused by the data.
The fact that only port 8 is chosen is odd. I had a likewise issue with a 8/1 Hama/Axing switch, that on any motor command (not being GotoNn from 1 to 7, it turned out only later) switched to port 8! But, in fact, that switch was meant that way, it turned out; and you are not sending motor commands to your switch.....

Switching to another diseqc 1.1 port, and then back to port 4 again, will not restore the switches's positions again, I presume; as then you would again need the diseqc 1.0 command. So that cannot be a workaround... :(

My two cents guess would be: it's the switch.

greetz,
A33
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brct203
Brct203, first off, great way to do the tests with LEDs!

Secondly, why port 4 on the 8x1 for the 4x1 to be attached to? I would try port 1 on the 8x1, and see what happens, and whether you get the same errors.

Also, you might want to try this, on all the ports without the 4x1, set the 1.0 switch to 1/4 (instead of disabled).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brct203

Orbitron T24 Help

What sat am I on, trying to get SES 2 and LPB?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 3)