I see some switches being sold and advertised as "stackable." Does that mean I could use 2 of the 4-port switches to make an 8-port switch?
Stackable indicates that they are designed to be used in series and pass-though signaling to establish the signal path.
well, you could consider having a 4-port switch near a dish, for example to switch between several LNBs on the same motorized dish (C, Ku, maybe Circular C), and then one cable, and then bring that cable to another switch which could also be fed by a few stationary dishes in another location (where it would not be so practical to have everything connected to just one switch).Thanks. What would be a practicle application for stacking?
well, you could consider having a 4-port switch near a dish, for example to switch between several LNBs on the same motorized dish (C, Ku, maybe Circular C), and then one cable, and then bring that cable to another switch which could also be fed by a few stationary dishes in another location (where it would not be so practical to have everything connected to just one switch)
My understanding is that you could connect a Diseqc 1.1 to the receiver, and then several 1.0 switches to each input of the 1.1 switch. So in each combination, the path of the active LNB would go at most through one 1.0 switch and then the 1.1 switch. In the satellite configuration in the receiver, you typically have a selection for the 1.0 protocol and another line for the 1.1 protocol. (at least the Amiko does). But maybe i'm doing this wrong, since it did not work for me...In this scenario, how does the receiver know which switch is which?
Every diseqc switch 'knows' exactly to what command(s) it will respond, and will not respond to other commands. So in your receiver you have to match the diseqc commands to the switch-ports at which your LNBs are connected.
Makes sense, as "Port A, B, C, D" would be the only option for a Diseqc 1.1 4x1 switch. But if you stack another 4x1 switch into the mix, there doesn't appear to be a way to distinguish between the two
yeah that's what I did... No luck switching the Diseqc 1.0 switch (located between the LNB and the Diseqc 1.1 switch)Have you read this thread? Switch setups simplified
On the Amiko if you run into a 8X1 switch and then a 4X1...
In the settings for the satellite you want. Under DiSEqC 1.1 choose which port of the 8X1, the 4X1 is attached to. Then in 1.0 choose which port of the 4X1 the LNBF is attached to.
yeah that's what I did... No luck switching the Diseqc 1.0 switch (located between the LNB and the Diseqc 1.1 switch)
yep, it's definitely goodHave you checked the Diseqc 1.0 switch all alone, to make sure it didn't fry? NEVER hook/unhook POWERED coax from a Diseqc switch, otherwise you are taking a big chance you'll blow it out.
yep, it's definitely good
exactly, all the switches work fine individually.So, leaving the 1.1 switch out, the 1.0 switch works OK?
And vice versa, leaving the 1.0 switch out, the 1.1 switch works OK?
What 1.1 switch do you have? There was an EMP switch that repeated commands, that caused problems with 1.0 switches.
What diseqc command setup do you have in your receiver?
Greetz,
A33
Diseqc 1.1 : port 5/8
No I don't think the receiver has those optionsI would expect 5/16, but if you have 5/8 in your menu, that is OK also.
Do you have options like setting command order or diseqc repeat in your receiver? Have you tried those?
Another thing that can happen, is that a newly reached 1.0 switch has a relatively high starting current, causing the 1.1 switch to 'reset' and go to port 1 again.
That is because in the cheaper switches, they sometimes leave out a capacitor at the switching IC, it seems, that would normally equalize voltage fluctuations.
This effect (the switching to port 1 again) should be detectable, I would say, but I've never come across this myself.
If the problem lies in 22kHz commands not reaching the 1.0 switch, due to hardware insufficiencies, I wouldn't know how to test that further...
greetz,
A33
Would you not have to ensure the Diseqc 1.1 command is sent first to 'open' port 5 before the Diseqc 1.0 command is sent, otherwise there's no way for the 1.0 command to reach its destination?so for example, if i have the LNB on port 2 of the 1.0 switch, with the output of the 1.0 connected to port 5 of the 1.1 switch, in the receiver I would select :
Diseqc 1.0 : port 2/4
Diseqc 1.1 : port 5/8