They "switching to sd equivalent" is a signal loss message. Are you EA or WA and what is your signal strength on the satellites affected?
See the post above. Yes, the HD signal was lost, but because Dish is tweaking. No system problems whatsoever.
They "switching to sd equivalent" is a signal loss message. Are you EA or WA and what is your signal strength on the satellites affected?
I recently went from Samsung 47" to Sharp 60", immediately I thought my new TV was inferior to the 47.....after calibrating the new set I discovered setting my Hopper to 720 did away with the poor picture quality I was seeing, sharper images and graphics. I went on the read via google that must programs are broadcast in 720 currently anyway....? The larger screens seem to exemplify flaws in the broadcast, even with a 12 -16 mil pixel count, it's pretty good but it's not Blu-Ray quality yet.
Living in a 954** zip we receive SF locals, the local Fox affiliate channel 2 has the jagged edges the TS mention several pages ago. I have deducted all broadcast are not equal, and maybe all installers aren't either. I recently bought a signal meter and discovered my dish needed significant tuning only weeks after the Dish tech was out to align the dish....thankfully Dish comp that alignment.
I believe as TVs get better the quality of the broadcast becomes, in some cases, painfully obvious.
I think so they either fall under the Discovery Channel family of networks or they fall in the AE family of networks.Yeah and it is only on these channels always, with the exception of 182 DISC this time. It was fine for two weeks after the last occurrence. Are ID, Animal Planet and TLC affiliated?
Posted Via The FREE SatelliteGuys Reader App!
I recently went from Samsung 47" to Sharp 60", immediately I thought my new TV was inferior to the 47.....after calibrating the new set I discovered setting my Hopper to 720 did away with the poor picture quality I was seeing, sharper images and graphics. I went on the read via google that must programs are broadcast in 720 currently anyway....? The larger screens seem to exemplify flaws in the broadcast, even with a 12 -16 mil pixel count, it's pretty good but it's not Blu-Ray quality yet.
Living in a 954** zip we receive SF locals, the local Fox affiliate channel 2 has the jagged edges the TS mention several pages ago. I have deducted all broadcast are not equal, and maybe all installers aren't either. I recently bought a signal meter and discovered my dish needed significant tuning only weeks after the Dish tech was out to align the dish....thankfully Dish comp that alignment.
I believe as TVs get better the quality of the broadcast becomes, in some cases, painfully obvious.