So what happens when the Deathstar takes over Time Warner?

Status
Please reply by conversation.
First its ridicules that any president has any say on things like this!

I just see how it can be stopped?.....Look at the monster they helped create with the Comcast deal?
The FCC allowed it, now you just point to that deal as the precedent sent!
You mean "ridiculous", correct? And no, the FCC Chair and the Members of the FCC serve at the pleasure of the POTUS...So yes, the POTUS does indeed have a say
 
You sound a bit conspiracy theorist. When it comes to HBO, they are going to want to make profit. Pricing out fans who don't sub to Directv is stupid, and they know that. Also, regardless of anyone's political agenda, including Bill Maher, AT&T aren't known as the great conservatives that you imply them to be. I'll leave the rest of this statement for The Pit.
Just a minute. Comcast does the same thing in the Philly sports market. Comcast Sportsnet Philadelphia is unavailable to those who do not subscribe to Comcast Cable.
But for the rules set by the FCC, I am certain, Comcast would do the same in markets where the company owns the RSN. However, Comcast can make it cost prohibitive to other providers to distribute the service so as long as the other providers pay the same price.
 
If Donald even mentioned it he would be making just another big mistake.....Presidents may have opinions, they cannot tell officials how to vote!

And it still comes down to the cockamamie Capitalism mantra!....Funny same people that like one big deal dont like another?

These corporations are killing us, Congress dont care....Just give them there money for the next election!Thats all that matters......Comcast did it, now AT&T will...
HUH?
Do not delude yourself into believing that The Federal Reserve Chair, FCC Chair and a host of other depts in the federal government where the Chair and the members of the entity serve at the pleasure of the president do not act in the interests of political considerations. They do and that is the way it has always been
 
In 2005 SBC Communications bought ATT. They owned Southwestern Bell. one of the baby Bells split off of the original ATT in 1983. So the current ATT is a totally differently managed company than before 2005. It is headquartered in Dallas, TX It has 277K employees who gave it a rating of one of the best companies to work for. It was ranked as the 7th best company for employee diversity. I believe the 25k Time Warner,Inc employees will find a much better employment environment.
Very nice. Te only thing is AT&T is NOT buying Time Warner Cable. The are attempting to buy the media company known as Time Warner.
 
In 2005 SBC Communications bought ATT. They owned Southwestern Bell. one of the baby Bells split off of the original ATT in 1983. So the current ATT is a totally differently managed company than before 2005. It is headquartered in Dallas, TX It has 277K employees who gave it a rating of one of the best companies to work for. It was ranked as the 7th best company for employee diversity. I believe the 25k Time Warner,Inc employees will find a much better employment environment.
Define 'diversity'?. And then explain the purpose this serves? Then expound on the results.
 
What if Dish was going to buy them?
Oppose.
I oppose any consolidation where the consumer is deprived of choice.
I cite the airline industry. Carriers in a fit of merger mania swallowed up their competitors. Some out of sheer fiscal necessity some deal were "friendly"....The result is fewer choices for the consumer and higher fares. Since 2011 the remaining carriers are scoring record profits.
They all use the same business model. Smaller aircraft which means fewer seats per flight. Carriers also slashed the number of flights per day to popular destinations. By limiting the availability of the product, the demand was artificially increased.. Higher demand means higher prices.
The only airline that is an outlier is Southwest.
 
That couldn't have anything to do with Southwest signing a long term guaranteed fuel price contract.....

You know what else limits customers options and causes inflated prices? When the competition can no longer be competitive and has to price themselves out of the market. Consolidation is not always a bad thing, but it is something that you must approve with caution.
 
The FCC Chair and the members of the commission serve at the pleasure of the President. Meaning, as with any other POTUS appointee, the Chair ZCommission members as well) can be removed at any time at the sole discretion of the POTUS

According to the FCC's website, the commissioners are appointed by the president and serve five year terms, except when replacing a commissioner.

"Five Commissioners direct the FCC. They are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Only three Commissioners can be of the same political party at any given time and none can have a financial interest in any Commission-related business. The President selects one of the Commissioners to serve as Chairperson. All Commissioners, including the Chairperson, have five-year terms, except when filling an unexpired term."

As for that remark that Presidential appointees can be "removed at any time." I know that is not correct, at least with the FCC, and with Social Security (I work for Social Security) and the SSA commissioner serves a six year term. Of course, we've had a "interim" commissioner for four or five years now it seems.


Sent from my iPad using the SatelliteGuys app!
 
What could happen is the base price of HBO seems to be anywhere from $15(Now) -$19(DISH) DirecTV subs could get a $5 discount vs. other subs when adding HBO (owned by AT&T at this point) onto their DirecTV bill.(owned by AT&T) Of course this is such a moot point since right now I get HBO for $7.50 through DISH.

Not for nothing, Dish subs just got a big discount. $10 for life, if we subbed in a certain time. What's the difference?
 
Just a minute. Comcast does the same thing in the Philly sports market. Comcast Sportsnet Philadelphia is unavailable to those who do not subscribe to Comcast Cable.
But for the rules set by the FCC, I am certain, Comcast would do the same in markets where the company owns the RSN. However, Comcast can make it cost prohibitive to other providers to distribute the service so as long as the other providers pay the same price.

But, such is not the case with NBC Boston.
 
They have (or had) two more options for a full power stations serving Boston (and not Manchester, NH) that they could attempt to buy, WWDP from EVine Inc or WYDN from Daystar, IF they REALLY care about serving the market. Sounds like they are just trying to line their pockets even more and screw OTA viewers in the process. I look for their experiment to become another WWJ-62 Detroit. At least WWJ was a full power station serving Detroit.




Sent from my iPad using the SatelliteGuys app!

Where's your evidence? People speculated them buying other stations, including WFXT from Cox and WBPX from Ion. But, nothing was ever made certain as options. Fact is, they want a better station. Do you actually think they want worse penertration into Boston-Metro? It's their only current option.
 
The whole premise of appointing - not electing - is the party in power appoints people to do what they want. What would be the point otherwise? Rarely - though not unprecedented - will a President or party leader make a statement this person or that person will be voting they way they want. But of course the Party consults with these people and a strategy is arrived at.

The five Senate confirmed FTC commissioners are appointed for 7 year terms, with one term expiring each year. No more than 3 commissioners can be from the same political party. If a commissioner resigns, dies, etc., before his/her term expires, an appointed replacement only serves for the remainder of the original term. About the only power an incoming President has over the FTC is choosing which current commissioner serves as chairperson.
 
Past presidents have only made appointments when the nominees have all submitted signed undated resignation letters.

Even without such, I can't imagine any president would have much trouble ousting any commissioners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tampa8
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top