I have contacted the FCC as follows:
I am a member of a select group which Robert W. Johnson, Sr., the founding CEO of Sky Angel called "Sky Angel" sponsors. There is an undisclosed number of us that provided "up-front funding" for the Sky Angel DBS system during the first thirty months of operation by purchasing "lifelong subscriptions" to the programming. I have just learned, not through Sky Angel but through a third party, that Sky Angel has requested permission from the FCC to transfer ownership of its satellite frequencies to DISH Network and if approved will discontinue providing DBS service shortly after FCC approval. Apparently Sky Angel will be transitioning to a broadband Internet protocol, commonly known as IPTV, with programming still delivered to the TV. It will be received by the viewer through a broadband Internet connection and small set-top box. The IPTV technology does not require an outside dish or antenna, professionally installed equipment or a computer.
My question is what provision does the Sky Angel request to the FCC make for the undisclosed number of Sky Angel sponsors, or lifelong subscribers, who invested in the Sky Angel vision? A free subscription to the IPTV system and provision of the set-top box in itself would not satisfy the requirement unless the subscriber just happened to already have broadband internet service. To subscribe for a broadband internet service would cost more than a Sky Angel subscription. If Sky Angel sells its FCC authorized frequencies to Dish would Dish then be obligated to honor the lifelong subscriptions, or would Sky Angel be obligated to provide free IPTV subscriptions w/ equipment and broadband internet subscriptions, or would Sky Angel be expected to compensate monetarily those that are disadvantaged by the sale? Again, Sky Angel has not provided any insight into these negotiations.