I would have to say as a 922 user since they first became available, they finally have it working properly.
But, when you consider you have to pay $200 for the upgrade vs a 722 and you have to pay $4/month more, it seriously makes the 722 look like the better receiver. The buyer will have to decide if more recording space and a fancy interface is worth the extra money. Dish through their slow update process has made it clear that the 922 is not going to be the flagship receiver. The 722 still gets things before the 922. Yes you can say sling was always on the 922, but it really was not fixed to work reliably until the 722 got sling. The 722 also got google TV first (I assume they will get it to work with the 922 one day).
Dish has been slow with the bug fixes and updates on the 922. It is the neglected receiver not the flagship. It works well enough now for me to say go for it if you want to pay the extra money for the fancy menus and extra recording space.
But, when you consider you have to pay $200 for the upgrade vs a 722 and you have to pay $4/month more, it seriously makes the 722 look like the better receiver. The buyer will have to decide if more recording space and a fancy interface is worth the extra money. Dish through their slow update process has made it clear that the 922 is not going to be the flagship receiver. The 722 still gets things before the 922. Yes you can say sling was always on the 922, but it really was not fixed to work reliably until the 722 got sling. The 722 also got google TV first (I assume they will get it to work with the 922 one day).
Dish has been slow with the bug fixes and updates on the 922. It is the neglected receiver not the flagship. It works well enough now for me to say go for it if you want to pay the extra money for the fancy menus and extra recording space.