Ken F said:ESPN won't allow any provider to carry ESPN-HD unless they also carry (and pay for) ESPN, ESPN News, and ESPN2. It has been confirmed in the past that HBO and Showtime would not sell their HD feeds separately from the SD channels.
Even if Voom could drop a duplicate SD feed of a premium, they'll have to pay for it either way, which means you'll have to pay for it too.
I agree. I think most of Voom's customers are only using Voom for HD in a Home Theater/Recreation Room type of setup. With big HD sets and projectors most SD looks like Doodoo anyway.GeneWildershair said:this is kind of dumb, because I would gladly still pay them full cost just for the HD channel. I don't even watch the SD version of any of these channels, so why not just get rid of them, and keep paying what we're paying?
madpoet said:ESPN HD doesn't show a lot of the programming like PTI that the SD channels show. And I am one grumpy a$$hole without my daily dose of PTI .
astrossuperfan said:Actually this kind of talk is a moot point, when Voom goes to Mpeg-4 it will free up all kinds of space.
They should still cut cinema 10 to 5 though.
IF!!!!!!!!astrossuperfan said:Actually this kind of talk is a moot point, when Voom goes to Mpeg-4 it will free up all kinds of space.
They should still cut cinema 10 to 5 though.
JimP said:My understanding is that when services such as Voom contracts for a certain channel, they get it as part of a package and have to broadcast the other channels in the package as well.
With that said, I wouldn't mind compressing the heck out of the stations that are the SD duplicates of the HD channels. Whose watching them anyway.
seandudley said:Yea, that's an idea! If VOOM is forced to carry these duplicate SD versions of the channels, they should compress them so much that they take up hardly and bandwidth and are unwatchable, but meet the requirement of being there.