superharo said:**On the other hand, one could speculate that DISH is aware of the fact that many of they're customers are using the "moving " option to get the programming they want. It's something that would be difficult to prove and might be more trouble than it's worth to enforce - so they turn a blind eye. If they truly wanted to attempt to eliminate this practice they could implement a rule stating that your "billing address" is REQUIRED to be the same as your "service address".
As for that, you're implying that Dish is inviting more negative attention, which I sincerely doubt they'd want to do at this point. Also, some people live in rural areas where they don't get delivery from the USPS and I hear it's wicked difficult to get a line of sight from one of those P.O. Boxes.
Now for Captain Tact.
dishrich said:wrong - the last SHVERA changes do NOT allow waivers in LIL markets. If your market has LIL, you CANNOT get distants - PERIOD.
I didn't say waivers through Dish, I said through the DMA. They have final say over what you're allowed to view and they're borderline omnipotent because of the FCC as long as they contine to provide clean, family, rehashed garbage programming and worthless local news. They CAN give you waivers for other markets, they just won't because they have you by the cojones. You'd sooner see Honolulu nets broadcast in Maine because they had a demand for it than you would see Dish being allowed to provide a nationwide broadcast of HD nets.
dishrich said:What DOES the audit Nazis have ANYTHING to do with this - their ONLY concern is with account stacking/no phone lines. They could care less WHERE you're at, as long as you have phone lines - the fact the phone lines are NOT necessarily in your area doesn't make ANY difference.
Wrong. Receiving programming at a fake address outside your DMA IS account stacking. If you get your programming at an address other than the physical, that's called stacking, regardless of whether you're actually using the physical.
dishrich said:Yea, I'm sure THAT will change the whole DMA/local TV makeup in a BIG hurry.
Once again, faster than posting on a messageboard.
dishrich said:OK, since you seem to know it all, just now many times HAS E* (or D* for that matter) been fined for a "mover" NOT being at the addy on their account?
Not sure of the stats on that, but I know the amount/duration of the fine and what happens to an agent who sets up an account that way, and neither of them are fun.
dishrich said:REALLY - & HOW should we go about doing this? Maybe if we all call up our stations & say "please, pretty please with sugar on it, get an HD signal up", why I bet they'll just have it up & running tomorrow - why didn't the rest of us think of this?
Think PBS funding drives. Or whining. Considering the gigantic corporations that own the 4 major networks, if they were really concerned with providing their viewers with HD, they could toss some pocket change at the poor little DMAs that are getting so many complaints about the lack of HD.
dishrich said:Oh yea, because most of these agents making $5 an hour REALLY give a rat's heiny about different billing/physical addys on someone's account.
Make someone who gets $5/hr to listen to someone like you angry and see how quickly you get audited.