Scott Greczkowski said:I would not put any money on it eaither, and now with Dish Buying the VOOM spectrum, MPEG4 could be put off for years, breathing new life once again into the 921. Now only if they would add NBR and OpenTV to it.
jsanders said:If they would just fix the OTA guide data so it would do sub-channels and not require the local subscription, I would be relatively happy.
NightRyder said:The acquisition of the V* bird will have no effect on E* MPEG4 plans. E* needs MPEG4 to be able to keep pace with D*.
NightRyder
Bill R said:From what I have been able to find out those statements are 100 percent correct. I was told (by someone at DISH that I know Scott has talked to) that "DISH can't afford to pospone the rollout of MPEG4".
Scott,
I don't know if it is just wishful thinking on your part or what but I think that you are giving your readers "false hope" by saying MPEG4 will be delayed. Talk to some of your contacts at DISH and you you will "see" what is going on concerning MPEG4.
Damn, it's a no win situation for E* here. 811/921/942 people say MPEG-4 kills their investment. You're saying they have to rush it, even though they have enough capacity now to do as much HD as VOOM did in MPEG-2. I say to take it slow, do it right, and put up some easy stuff like Universal HD now.korsjs said:bad move if the postpone it. they need to get something done on time and make sure it works.
mdonnelly said:Damn, it's a no win situation for E* here. 811/921/942 people say MPEG-4 kills their investment. You're saying they have to rush it, even though they have enough capacity now to do as much HD as VOOM did in MPEG-2. I say to take it slow, do it right, and put up some easy stuff like Universal HD now.
mdonnelly said:Damn, it's a no win situation for E* here. 811/921/942 people say MPEG-4 kills their investment. You're saying they have to rush it, even though they have enough capacity now to do as much HD as VOOM did in MPEG-2. I say to take it slow, do it right, and put up some easy stuff like Universal HD now.
Charlie can adjust to changing situations (you guys call it a breach of faith). Look, you can get lots of room on 110/119 by moving all the locals for D.C., Pittsburgh, Philly, Orlando, Atlanta, Chicago, Cleveland, Tampa, Boston and NYC to the 61.5 sat. They already have split locals with 61.5/110/119. Kills 2 birds with one stone.korsjs said:i think they need to get some more hd up before directv offers the locals in hd. that means getting a role on mpeg4. charlie said no more hd until mpeg4.
My understanding is that the LOCALS have to be on one dish. The core can be somewhere else.jsanders said:What about that law that is forcing Dish to provide a 1 Dish solution? You can't put 110/119 and 61.5 on one dish.
jsanders said:What about that law that is forcing Dish to provide a 1 Dish solution? You can't put 110/119 and 61.5 on one dish.
Bobby said:No you can't, but you can put all of the locals on 61.5. That meets the laws criteria. The law pertains to locals only. They have no problem with all of the locals on one dish and anything else you'd like to watch on a different dish.
mdonnelly said:Charlie can adjust to changing situations (you guys call it a breach of faith). Look, you can get lots of room on 110/119 by moving all the locals for D.C., Pittsburgh, Philly, Orlando, Atlanta, Chicago, Cleveland, Tampa, Boston and NYC to the 61.5 sat. They already have split locals with 61.5/110/119. Kills 2 birds with one stone.
Use the slack on 110/119 to put up a couple HD channels. More sats are coming online soon at 105 and 85 for locals. Do the same for them. Leave the core SD/HD at 110/119, give everyone else a one-dish local on the wings, all at MPEG-2.
After a while, with due testing, MPEG-4 can come online with a well designed/produced receiver, just in time for a boom in HD content.