performance barely tolerable
Newbie to this forum, sling adapter on a 722k for just over 30 days, not impressed with several key things.
first I run dual network at home, one wireless network is for my "connecteds", these would be things like Wii, A/V receiver with Inet, Bluray, & Dish 722k's. The second network is primary to my gateway router, for laptops & wireless computers.
I was glad to see that the streaming data didn't leave my network so that I'm not sitting waiting for data to go from the back room, up (out) to Dish and back to me ... but ...
- I was not happy to see ... some sort of back channel communication that did signal back to dish/sling, and whilst it did this, it would effect playback, anything from stutter to video slowing and then suddenly playing catch up (audio with the respected video would *not* show the same catch-up that video did)
- Was also not happy to see that I couldn't reliably stream audio only stations.
I liken THAT experience to having a kid sitting at a recordplayer, letting the music play for a bit (under 30 seconds on avg) normally then that kid starts putting pressure on the record .... slowing its spin some, then easing up so the record spins back up again.. and then the kid does it again and again and again.. playing with all sorts of slow down and speed up tricks ...
- still not happy with the bandwidth used on *any* setting of the SD/HD options of the plugin, both under IE8 and FF3.x and that may lead to the biggest lie in print with the SlingAdapter.
- 150k or better? when tuning in an "audio only" station like the sirius channels, I've seen the k's go below 90 ... and in that instance the audio is effected like I describe above with the kid and his finger on the record
- 600k or higher? for SD ... try it nails my network at anywhere from 1.8 meg to 7meg!
- 3M or higher -- yeah.. on the lowest quality setting in house, I still see the network pushing 3 to 7 megs on average, even their own "Streaming at ..." figures show that no matter what setting in the web player, that the sling box will take any bandwidth it can get.
Even from outside my home (Good/Better/Best) ... as a test I streamed for 15 minutes, and never saw the stream go below 2 meg except as it jittered/stuttered/played catch-up.
Does it allow external access to DVR/Live TV? Sure ... but at no time have I seen this thing work flawlessly within a data range they suggest. Its like "because the bandwidth is there", its going to use what it can, rather than conform to a limit ... and given near limitless bandwidth, why they wouldn't it be able to stream perfectly?
If I hadn't put the "connecteds" on a separate network, I could only imagine how negative the experience would've been. I was actually running the connecteds on a G based network, and have subsequently upgraded to N (G -> 54M / N -> 300M) because the performance needed it. Yet... streaming video to my bluray ... I have no problems there.. and that's for data coming from Youtube, or from inside my network via DLNA, with quality that easily rivals the "better" setting.
What I believe this comes down to, the intensive data manipulation (encryption/encryption) is still too much for the boxes, they are underpowered, or their firmware/software is still wholly inadequate.
Reason for getting Sling -> a family member works on a govt contract and travels frequently ... needed for access to DVR'd items that arent' available in hotel rooms.
As my subject line says.. if I were to rate this, it would be performance barely tolerable. Not acceptable, but tolerated. I don't have the tools needed to be able to break this thing open, recode for them, but for the amount of money and time Dish and Sling should have in this, the performance thus far is abysmal.
Sling Adapter performance is about on par with my opinion of the 722k. My 625's were damned near bullet proof (aside from failing hard drives). Dish could do better.