SatelliteAV Motorized System Giveaway, We Have a Winner!

[kevingilmore]

I would go with the visionsat as i need some pvr capability. Less than
half of what i watch i'm able to record for later.

 

[lumpkin666]

I'd choose the Visionsat IV-200, the PVR functionality is something I'd like to tinker with (and I already have fortec products, so I'd like to try something else)

 

[dwingel]

I like Visionsat for the PVR feature. Thanks Satellite AV.

 

[aperry]

My choice would be the Visionsat IV-200 receiver. It has PVR, and I can't imagine watching TV without a PVR.

 

[johnalred]

Oh please, please ... I want a Visionsat IV-200 satellite receiver / PVR

 

[funkymonkey]

Visionsat IV-200 because of the PVR and because I just bought a new house and want to get into FTA as a hobby. Just thought it would be fun.

 

[melbfla]

I would like the Visionsat for the PVR . I have a fortec now but this system would make a great wedding gift for my son.
Thanks Satellite AV.

 

[stevet96]

Visionsat IV-200 satellite receiver / PVR

Must have a PVR!!

 

[Hazelwood]

The Mercury II.
Fortec has been around for years. I've bought too many "latest and greatest" receivers only to find they suck at C Band and Ku linear.
The power scan features sound great for blind scanning between a frequency range instead of going through the entire band.
Thanks for the contest.

 

[Wescopc]

Would love to win!

Visionsat IV-200 satellite receiver, I have never had a PVR
Bob

 

[howie14]

I'd go with the Visionsat for the PVR. I'm itching to try one of those with FTA.

 

[shrike3000]

Visonsat would be my choice for sure! I like the PVR capability as well as the fact that it utilizes an external hard drive so the recording time is up to me.

 

[Tokzyb]

I would like the Visionsat IV-200 Satelite receiver with Pvr.The Pvr is an awesome feature. I will indulge in FTA for the first time with your awesome Visionsat IV-200,Thanks Satellite AV more grease to your elbow.

 

[scottc98]

Very tough decision! Visionsat would be great for PVR and would a great receiver to give the wife. Merc II has component out that I would really like to have. It also beeps on signal strength and would be great for sat installation (since I am always tweaking a dish

In the end, I'd have to go with the Visionsat. Wife always trumps

 

[rv1pop]

Thank you for the giveaway program.
I will enjoy the Visionsat unit for several reasons, first is the PVR function, but making the use of PVR usable, it uses one amp/hour less power from my 12 volt batteries than the Mercury unit!
I am on solar and batteries and even though I live in rural US, we are $18,000 from power lines and the 30 foot tower for the OTA antenna has blown over one last time. For what I have paid to "almost" get 3 channels OTA would have paid for an FTA setup long ago. I just got the GLORYSTAR system installed, WOW! The third reason for Visionsat --- This website, it has the answers I need fo keep it going! Thanks again..

 

[Tyrate]

I perfer the Visionsat IV 200 with the PVR, you can pretty much choose the size of your PVR hard drive, great option! I also love the motorized mount, I wish I had one for my UHF antenna.

 

[i4tas]

I'd go with the Visionsat. Currently i am PVRless

 

[Gary Z]

I'd want the Visionsat due to the PVR capabilities.

 

[wildboys]

I would go for VISIONSAT IV-200 PVR
I have read alot of good things about it.

 

[ChuckBoozer]

I've already got a Merc II (love it), so I would choose the Visionsat IV-200 so I could enjoy the PVR capability. :up