Occasionally I work from home, and with the amount of snow we've received so far this winter, it has been more so then normal. My internet service from Time Warner has always been top notch reliable and completely rock solid, but so far this Winter, snow plows have destroyed the cabling at the pole, not once, not twice but three times. Each time requiring a new line from my tap to the RG11 line that runs into my garage. They have been quick to respond, but with the horrific snow that we received this winter, coupled with the driving bans, it does mean I'm without internet (phone and cable TV) access for a day or two.
Due to the mission critical nature of some of the things I am responsible for at work, I can't be without internet access, when I work from home. So I need a reliable back up to my 50Mb (actually overprovisioned to 55Mb) cable connection. Verizon does not provide DSL service at my address, there are no WISPs in the area and cellular data is not an option. I live in a rural area. AT&T has no 4G here, T-Mobile has no service here period, Verizon has 4G but due to the distance of where I am from the tower speeds were never that great provided I can maintain a connection and I am currently a Sprint customer, I can get one bar of LTE in my bathroom, that gives me an average of 15Mb down/5Mb up, but once I leave the bathroom, I drop to 1X.
So I'm exploring satellite as an option. Work will reimburse me any and all installation costs and like my normal TWC broadband, they will allow me to expense my back up internet. So essentially this will not cost me a dime. So which sucks less, Hughes or Exede? I am a networking guy, but never played around with setting up and configuring a dual WAN set up. At home I am outfitted with Cisco gear from their Small Business line and have an RV320 router which supports dual WAN load balancing and failover.
1) Which sucks less Hughes Net or Excede? Gen 4 is available in my area and so is Excede according to Wild Blue's website.
2) I know the latency is outrageous with satellite internet, is the high latency enough to make doing RDP or VNC while connected to my company's SSL VPN near impossible?
3) With both satellite internet providers if you go over your cap, you're just slowed down to dial up speeds correct? There are no overages?
4) In a dual WAN failover set up, is it possible to restrict what the secondary internet source can feed and have it restricted somehow by local IP address, MAC address or router port numbers? For example, my four port router feeds my main desktop PC directly, two Cisco SG-200 8 port smart switches in different areas of the house and my Cisco WAP371 wireless access point. If I was in a failover situation and running solely on satellite internet, I would not want smartswitch #2 to have any internet access since that feeds data to all of my home entertainment devices (TV, A/V Receiver, Blu Ray Player, PS4, Xbox One, DirecTV DECA and Genie Go). I don't really want a chunk of my satellite cap to be chewed up by an Xbox or Playstation update, or me being bone headed and doing something like downloading a game inadvertently. Smart switch #1 just feeds two additional desktop PCs, one which is rarely ever used, and my Philips Hue hockey puck so I don't care about that and I don't run a lot my on WIFI other than my two laptops and printer, which would be needed for work purposes if I'm stuck at home.
Does a sat internet solution make sense in my situation? Any other thoughts on the idea?
Due to the mission critical nature of some of the things I am responsible for at work, I can't be without internet access, when I work from home. So I need a reliable back up to my 50Mb (actually overprovisioned to 55Mb) cable connection. Verizon does not provide DSL service at my address, there are no WISPs in the area and cellular data is not an option. I live in a rural area. AT&T has no 4G here, T-Mobile has no service here period, Verizon has 4G but due to the distance of where I am from the tower speeds were never that great provided I can maintain a connection and I am currently a Sprint customer, I can get one bar of LTE in my bathroom, that gives me an average of 15Mb down/5Mb up, but once I leave the bathroom, I drop to 1X.
So I'm exploring satellite as an option. Work will reimburse me any and all installation costs and like my normal TWC broadband, they will allow me to expense my back up internet. So essentially this will not cost me a dime. So which sucks less, Hughes or Exede? I am a networking guy, but never played around with setting up and configuring a dual WAN set up. At home I am outfitted with Cisco gear from their Small Business line and have an RV320 router which supports dual WAN load balancing and failover.
1) Which sucks less Hughes Net or Excede? Gen 4 is available in my area and so is Excede according to Wild Blue's website.
2) I know the latency is outrageous with satellite internet, is the high latency enough to make doing RDP or VNC while connected to my company's SSL VPN near impossible?
3) With both satellite internet providers if you go over your cap, you're just slowed down to dial up speeds correct? There are no overages?
4) In a dual WAN failover set up, is it possible to restrict what the secondary internet source can feed and have it restricted somehow by local IP address, MAC address or router port numbers? For example, my four port router feeds my main desktop PC directly, two Cisco SG-200 8 port smart switches in different areas of the house and my Cisco WAP371 wireless access point. If I was in a failover situation and running solely on satellite internet, I would not want smartswitch #2 to have any internet access since that feeds data to all of my home entertainment devices (TV, A/V Receiver, Blu Ray Player, PS4, Xbox One, DirecTV DECA and Genie Go). I don't really want a chunk of my satellite cap to be chewed up by an Xbox or Playstation update, or me being bone headed and doing something like downloading a game inadvertently. Smart switch #1 just feeds two additional desktop PCs, one which is rarely ever used, and my Philips Hue hockey puck so I don't care about that and I don't run a lot my on WIFI other than my two laptops and printer, which would be needed for work purposes if I'm stuck at home.
Does a sat internet solution make sense in my situation? Any other thoughts on the idea?