GaryPen said:Now, you can enjoy the breathtaking realism of seeing Giambi's veins bulge as the steroids kick in.
And you get the realism of watching the Mets win 65 games this year.
GaryPen said:Now, you can enjoy the breathtaking realism of seeing Giambi's veins bulge as the steroids kick in.
mboy said:And you get the realism of watching the Mets win 65 games this year.
mboy said:Funny thing is the Mets were only good 1 or 2 years and they won't be good for the forseable future.
They have a pretty high payroll past few years, that hasn't gotten them much has it?
At least for the past few years, the Yankees have been in contention. They have been in contention for a good portion of the last 100 years, more so then any other team. They will be in contention in the future as well. The Mets? NOPE!
Make fun of the Yankees all you want. I bet they get another championship before the Mets do.
:neener ....GOOD POST....GO YANKEESmboy said:Funny thing is the Mets were only good 1 or 2 years and they won't be good for the forseable future.
They have a pretty high payroll past few years, that hasn't gotten them much has it?
At least for the past few years, the Yankees have been in contention. They have been in contention for a good portion of the last 100 years, more so then any other team. They will be in contention in the future as well. The Mets? NOPE!
Make fun of the Yankees all you want. I bet they get another championship before the Mets do.
So? What's your point? Is there a problem here? I don't see anything wrong with your rules.GaryPen said:Rules to be a Yankee Fan
Well, tough! After all, I have to pay for your shopping channels. :shocked:dev:neenerStacy A said:This better be one of those ala carte channels, because I sure don't want it and I don't want to pay for it.
Stacy
Who cares how much they pay? It's all within the rules. Some owners would rather pad their own pockets rather than spend on trying to field a competitive team (Wilpon, et al). That's their choice, isn't it? It doesn't cost me a penny.GaryPen said:The Yankees wouldn't be the best team money can buy, either, of course. Just the most expensive. The Marlins would be the best team in '03. The Angels in '02. And, the Diamondbacks in '01.
AndyMon said:So? What's your point? Is there a problem here? I don't see anything wrong with your rules.
Perfectly sound coming from someone whose favorite team finished in LAST PLACE the past two years despite one of the largest payrolls in baseball, hehehe
AndyMon said:Who cares how much they pay? It's all within the rules. Some owners would rather pad their own pockets rather than spend on trying to field a competitive team (Wilpon, et al). That's their choice, isn't it? It doesn't cost me a penny.
It just goes to show that throwing money isn't going to guarantee a series winner. Some sound baseball decisions have to be made, too. Unfortunately, some (Wilpon, et al) fail miserably on both counts.
Gary, When referring to "your point", I meant about the "rules". I have no problem with others believing whatever they like. After all, everyone needs hope to survive.Gary wrote: I guess I won't mention the Yankees of the mid to late '60's, early to mid 70's, most of the 80's, and early 90's. Nope. I won't mention them at all. unh unh. Not a word. Not me.
My point being that teams have ups and downs. Fans stick with them. That's the way it is. So, don't waste your energy putting down fellow New Yorkers. There are plenty of Boston fans for you to have fun with. Plus, we ALL hate the Braves, so we got that goin' for us...which is nice.
AndyMon said:Gary, When referring to "your point", I meant about the "rules". I have no problem with others believing whatever they like. After all, everyone needs hope to survive.
Re: Yankees of the years you reference. I have fond memories of Horace Clarke, Ross Moschito, Johnny Ellis, Jake Gibbs, Ron Bloomberg, Roy White, Bobby Murcer, et al. Followed them religiously so I can empathise with what you, as a Met fan, have to go through most every year.
Insofar as putting down fellow NY'ers, I believe you opened that can of worms when you mentioned your disdain for Yankee fans, most of whom are NY'ers, although the Yanks do arguably have a greater following worldwide than any other sports franchise save Manchester United.
If it wasn't me I'm sure I chimed in Actually. I was trying to empathize and followed that up with a good natured tweak.GaryPen said:All I did was point out that NY Dish subscribers have been without ONE of their home teams, not team (singular). It was one of your fellow Yankee fans that felt the need to start up. He's a perfect example of who those rules were written about. (It wasn't you was it? )
I find quite the opposite to be true. I either hear Met fans whining about things like your "rules" or some other such nonsense or about their woeful team. Generally, most Yankee fans that I know pretty much ignore the Mets until some Met fan starts up. Why would we bother? The Mets are an afterthought to us. My experience has been that many Met fans suffer from a persecution complex and feelings of inadequacy.I never see Met fans give Yankee fans sh*t, unless sh*t upon first. I guess they don't feel the need for whatever reason.
Who can forget Pepitone. Very good player and an excellent defensive first baseman. No slouch in the outfield with a great arm.BTW, you left out Joe Pepitone, dude! And, who can forget Frank Tepedino, the perenial bench-warmer from Brooklyn, my home? And, I think Blomberg only had one "O". You can find him in the single-page (half-page?) book, "Greatest Jewish Sports Heroes".