So, what is this, the 4th or 5th time you tried to make this point? Are you trying to get a rise out of someone? Anyways, you even contradicted your own theory in this statement. If the NFL was "against whites" why weren't they pressured into suspending Coach Cable?
Case and point: the NFL's stance on Roethlisberger isn't a racist one. It's because he's been a part of continued off-the field distractions. (Multiple rape accusations, being photographed drunken and disorderly with pictures plastered over the internet and so on.) This is not the type of image the NFL wants to portray of a Super Bowl winning QB, black, white or purple!
It's a valid point, black white or purple. So Ray Lewis can be involved in covering for his friends in one possible murder, but not two? I understand Goodell was not the commissioner then, but the point stands.
Roethlisberger is (or was) one of the faces of the league. Cable has a face only a mother can love. Two different things.
Sandra