yeah I did too
but today its back at 12182 (was there last night)
Today I had the first lock-up ever since upgrading to the new firmware. And, it's repeatable. There's a 720p feed on 74W at 12160H SR 29269 that keeps locking it up. It won't do it 100% of the time, but it does it a lot more than not.
DVBWorld answered they "will consider" developing actual LAN functionality. In practical terms it may mean a 6-to-12-month lag if ever. Currently it has none, and seems to play nothing via the USB port either except own recorded content, but I haven't seen any reports saying it does it well. It should display at least Jpeg files via USB though, and depending on audio codecs included hopefully play some common audio file formats at a future point.
another "quirk" (nuisance)
Renaming channels is useless on some sats. The "blind scan boogie" sats (72,74,79,91,105 as example) dont bother renaming channels because if it rescans the TP it puts the old name back
Wow, that sucks. I hadn't tried renaming anything yet because I was expecting lots of firmware updates. I just assumed that it wouldn't replace the names when it re-scans them, because it keeps the "skip" flag if you set that.
I dont have lockups on that but I get the st-st-stuttering like a high bitrate channel does. Been "watching" for about 5 minutes now and was able to flip over to another channel
new "feature" (I guess)
If you scroll on the channel list to only show one satellite (say 91W) after you scan a satellite you dont get the whole list back. Its just the channels for that satellite.
That would be the key marketing point for DVBWorld to invest in developing these features, which hopefully won't span beyond the projected lifespan of this receiver. Having said that, developing new functionality is not that fast and easy as fixing most of plentiful UI and file saving bugs and deficiencies here and there. And it requires sound Linux knowledge from coders, real 100 mB/s Ethernet support from the LAN chipset used and familiarity with its commands set.As long as you could lock the signals and send the stream across the LAN, there wouldn't be any playback issues for 4.2.2 or highbit rate.
It didn't take any longer for me.