Ranking all 32 teams at quarterback

cybok0

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
Oct 23, 2006
12,786
39
Sha Ka Ree.
When ranking NFL quarterbacks, it's pretty easy to fill in slots three thru 32. Picking No. 1 and No. 2, on the other hand, is a real headache.

Who do you prefer? The reigning champion or the three-time champion? Which stat do you find more impressive — 12 playoff victories or 275 career touchdown passes? Do you like the guy who silenced his doubters last year or the guy who never had any doubters?

The following rankings are based on team depth charts, not just starters. So we're really pitting Peyton Manning, Jim Sorgi, and John Navarre against Tom Brady, Matt Cassell, and Matt Gutierrez. Does it really matter? When you think about Patriots vs. Colts, do you think of Sorgi vs. Cassell? If Matt Gutierrez fell in the woods, would he make a sound?

At Football Outsiders, we've done our homework. We've ranked the quarterbacks from all 32 teams based on our groundbreaking DVOA and DPAR metrics, our scouting and game charting data, and a healthy dollop of horse sense. For rookies and prospects, we used the Lewin Career Forecast System, a projection method so accurate that it has generated some sizzle among NFL insiders (you can read more about DVOA, DPAR, and Lewin's Career Forecast System in Football Prospectus 2007, available wherever fine paperbacks are sold). Armed with this arsenal, we can definitively say who's tops among NFL signal callers.

Here's a hint: he does a lot of commercials.

FOX Sports on MSN - NFL - Ranking all 32 teams at quarterback

I bet different people will have different views on this.:D
 
I can see Carson Palmer as the 4th best. If he could run better he would be higher.
 
FOX Sports on MSN - NFL - Ranking all 32 teams at quarterback

I bet different people will have different views on this.:D

20. Lions (2006 Rank: 24)

Jon Kitna put up good numbers on a bad team. (Nick Laham / Getty Images)

Jon Kitna finished 11th in the NFL in DPAR, but even Football Outsiders stats can be snookered once in a while. DVOA ranked him as a league-average quarterback, but an average quarterback who throws 596 passes is a pretty valuable commodity. Kitna was exceptional in the final two weeks of last season — 589 yards, seven touchdowns, one interception against the playoff-bound Bears and Cowboys — but he surrendered too many sacks and turnovers before the yuletide surge. He's a serviceable custodian who reads defenses well and can pick apart zones.

Dan Orlavsky and Drew Stanton are vying for the heir apparent role. Orlavsky, a third-year player from Connecticut, has NFL size and athleticism, but he hasn't distinguished himself. Stanton survived the John L. Smith era at Michigan State, so he's ready for the worst the Lions can throw at him. He's a scrambler who throws a nice short ball but needs to work on his mechanics and recognition.


Can you believe the Lions QB's are ranked this high ???

Kitna is servicable, can be good in the right situation...
It says he was exceptional in the last two weeks of the year !!!!

He should have been that way after game 10 when they were mathmatically eliminated, seeing there was no longer any pressure on him to make good on the year.

Orlovsky has not played enough to tell if he's any good.
Stanton being a rookie cannot be lumped in the good/bad catagory yet.
Do you consider Stanton to be a scrambler ? I don't, yet he can move around enogh to do good things, but would not consider him a scrambler, lets let him develop before we classify him as a scramlber.

Jimbo
 
WOO HOO! Vikes in last place

makes me wanna make that trek to Mankato for the 1st day of training camp ;)

JUST barely above you are my Oakland Faiders....I expect this seeing that we have 2 new QBs and one out indefinately....BUT with that said, I expect AT LEAST 6 wins...anything below that that will be VERY disappointing.
 
JUST barely above you are my Oakland Faiders....I expect this seeing that we have 2 new QBs and one out indefinately....BUT with that said, I expect AT LEAST 6 wins...anything below that that will be VERY disappointing.
With a last-place schedule, the Raiders will get some patsys. But even with that, six wins will be hard to come by for them.
 
With a last-place schedule, the Raiders will get some patsys. But even with that, six wins will be hard to come by for them.

Playing every team in the WEST, AND the two Super Bowl contestants, Jacksonville, and the NFC Central is NO WAY a "patsy" schedule. Plus you add an up and coming team like Tennessee and always good team in the Dolphins...and that is in NO WAY a "last place team" schedule.
 
Playing every team in the WEST, AND the two Super Bowl contestants, Jacksonville, and the NFC Central is NO WAY a "patsy" schedule. Plus you add an up and coming team like Tennessee and always good team in the Dolphins...and that is in NO WAY a "last place team" schedule.
Sorry, you don't get to pick what division you play in. Gonna have to play all those AFC West guys twice.
 
Sorry, you don't get to pick what division you play in. Gonna have to play all those AFC West guys twice.

THAT is very true....but you cannot automatically assume that just because you had the worst record in the league, you will get a patsy schedule. The Raiders schedule is a perfect example of that. And I have not seen the Browns schedule, but they too, play in a very tough, if not THE toughest division in the league.
 
He is overrated according to alot of people. His team got him the Super Bowl not him. He sucked in the Super Bowl.
 
truthfully, if palmer didn't get hurt in that first playoff game, i don't think the steelers win!! the bengals were the only team that had a substantial lead during any of those playoff games, including the super bowl.

my 2 cents.
 
THAT is very true....but you cannot automatically assume that just because you had the worst record in the league, you will get a patsy schedule. The Raiders schedule is a perfect example of that. And I have not seen the Browns schedule, but they too, play in a very tough, if not THE toughest division in the league.

The schedule USE to work that way,if you were the lowest rated team you played the weakest schedule the next year, it's not that way entirely anymore.

Jimbo
 
He is overrated according to alot of people. His team got him the Super Bowl not him. He sucked in the Super Bowl.

Ever look at what type of offense you run with a young QB ???
The Steelers had a perfect offense for the situation.
You could have put Palmer in Pittsburgh and He probably would have won as well.
The team Ben went to did not need a star QB at the time, they were a solid team and Ben had a solid year that year, not too bad for a rookie, or second year, I don't remember which. I know he played a few games the year before, so I guess that makes it NOT a rookie year, but for all intensive purposes, it was.

What did Palmer do in his rookie year ?

He sucked in the Super Bowl,
Ya he sucked, he made the plays needed to win the game, thats all that was needed.

Jimbo
 

Gary Sheffield at it AGAIN!

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts