In years past, the primary receiver would be whichever one results in the lowest total receiver fees for the customer. In other words, the most expensive one would be treated as primary (free) with the additional receiver fees only being charged on the cheaper receivers. That seems to have changed in recent years. I guess Dish is less concerned with keeping subscribers satisfied (or keeping them as subscribers at all) and simply want to charge as much money as possible, for the same level of service, to the remaining subscribers.My observation it that both your Hoppers must be owned for that to work, otherwise they place the owned one as primary with the $15 DVR fee ($0 lease fee) and the leased one as secondary with the $15 lease fee.
For an example from my account, I once had a purchased Hopper 3 and a purchased ViP222k activated at the same time, after the price change for purchased equipment went into effect. The weird quirk with this was that with both of these receivers active at the same time, DVR service was deactivated on the Hopper 3, so there was no DVR fee. Therefore, the fee structure that would result in the lowest fee would be to have the ViP222k as primary (free) and only charge the $5 additional outlet fee for the Hopper 3. Instead, the Hopper 3 was treated as the primary receiver, and I was charged the $10 additional outlet fee for the ViP222k, since it serves two TV's.
With the DVR fee, this would have made sense, as that would have made the Hopper 3 the most expensive receiver at $15. So, Dish would not have charged any additional amount for that receiver. However, like I said, the DVR was deactivated due to also having the ViP222k. With the ViP222k by itself, there were absolutely no receiver fees, and it served two TV's. However, whenever I would activate the Hopper 3, I was being charged for two additional outlets, when I was really only adding one additional TV beyond the two free TV's.
I never argued with Dish about this, since I never kept both receivers active at the same time for very long anyway. It was just a weird quirk with Dish's billing system that I noticed. So I thought "Well this is odd..." but just let it go. I figured this was an unusual case since probably not very many people have DVR service deactivated on their active DVR-model receivers. Based on the examples in the posts above though, it now seems that it is Dish's policy to charge the highest receiver fee possible with the configuration of equipment on each account.
Paul Harvey, but yeah...As Steve Harvey would say, "And now you know the rest of the story"