I think it's time to see the writting on the wall.
Dish has been basically stalling and shuffleing over the past few weeks, replying with ambigious emails, etc in an effort to quell the storm before their CES "unvailing", which, in my opinion, is going to reveal (among other things) that a lot of HD is NOT really going to be HD at all.
They'll take the "quantity over quality" road because there's no business reason not to. If they can beat "D" with more channels, then their PQ only has to be as good or slightly better than "D"s to stay ahead of them.
An indication that this may have been their plan for a while is the fact that their recent HD receivers are not really as "OTA friendly" as they could be. Single OTA tuner; not as good at signal reception and multipath rejection as other HD tuners; limited HD PVR functions for OTA without Dish locals.
Dish knew a decent network OTA digital signal was going to be better than what they wanted to offer, so they needed some incentive for viewers to still purchace the Dish locals.
I believe the only way we're ever going to have real HD with the intended quality is if the individule channels, networks and advertisers insist on it. Hopfully enough of them realize that viewers WILL recognize the difference and will base their viewing habits accordingly.
Competition dictates everything in the world of TV and we're seeing a good example of the negative effects of removing it. "E" buys Voom. "D" doesn't carry Voom. "E" can then do what it wants with Voom. I can just imagine where we'd be if "D" & "E" had merged. Actually from the looks of things lately, I'm not so sure they didn't.
Dish has been basically stalling and shuffleing over the past few weeks, replying with ambigious emails, etc in an effort to quell the storm before their CES "unvailing", which, in my opinion, is going to reveal (among other things) that a lot of HD is NOT really going to be HD at all.
They'll take the "quantity over quality" road because there's no business reason not to. If they can beat "D" with more channels, then their PQ only has to be as good or slightly better than "D"s to stay ahead of them.
An indication that this may have been their plan for a while is the fact that their recent HD receivers are not really as "OTA friendly" as they could be. Single OTA tuner; not as good at signal reception and multipath rejection as other HD tuners; limited HD PVR functions for OTA without Dish locals.
Dish knew a decent network OTA digital signal was going to be better than what they wanted to offer, so they needed some incentive for viewers to still purchace the Dish locals.
I believe the only way we're ever going to have real HD with the intended quality is if the individule channels, networks and advertisers insist on it. Hopfully enough of them realize that viewers WILL recognize the difference and will base their viewing habits accordingly.
Competition dictates everything in the world of TV and we're seeing a good example of the negative effects of removing it. "E" buys Voom. "D" doesn't carry Voom. "E" can then do what it wants with Voom. I can just imagine where we'd be if "D" & "E" had merged. Actually from the looks of things lately, I'm not so sure they didn't.