Let's just say a source from another site whom we Direct subs usually refer to when we get information about Direct. He is often referred to on this site
ETA: I tried to PM you the evidence, but your mailbox is full
As am II don't know why you felt the need to provide evidence, most people on here know that you know what you are talking about when it comes to DirecTV. I agree with you too, Fox will not pull channels off of *D, the working relationship is too close. They won't even threaten it, hell, the contracts will be signed before it even comes close to that point.
Just for the record, I am fully on the side of Dish in this dispute.
Dish Network created Dish America and AT120. They package the channels they see fit, and sell it to customers.HDRoberts said:Care to tell me how I can get the channels I want (Syfy, Comedy Central, TNT, USA, TBS, Food) without being forced to take ESPN and it's high price tag? You can't.
Dish Network created Dish America and AT120. They package the channels they see fit, and sell it to customers.
So if you want a service that provides a la carte, I'd respectfully suggest to start one.
Which is another reason why Direct and Fox will not go through this same problem when their contract expires well after 2010. Direct already places their RSNs in their lowest packageAnd, as I pointed out in that post, the issue seems to be that Fox wants RSNs in those packs. Pack locations are determined more by contract these days than provider choice. And they want to take away my choice.
And as soon as I get that DBS licence and $500,000,000 to build and launch a sat, I'll get right on that.
Huh? I'm fairly certain AT120 will exist even if Dish Network agrees to be like every other provider and add the Fox RSN's. That doesn't take away your choice, if the package still exists.HDRoberts said:And, as I pointed out in that post, the issue seems to be that Fox wants RSNs in those packs. Pack locations are determined more by contract these days than provider choice. And they want to take away my choice.
FYI. I just received, and I assume every other "E" sub in Arizona received, an e-mail from COX telling me that if I switched from "E" COX would include a free HDDVR, 3 months of HBO and Showtime, free installation, a free Wii, their best HD package which includes a total of 270 channels (not all HD of course), for $39mo for the first year. I have my reasons for turning this offer down but I think it shows the potential damage that "E" may face. And COX is only mentioning FSNAZ, Nat Geo, FX. No mention about the probable loss of FOX channel 10.
A free Wii? Really? That's wild...
Ghpr13
The various networks and programmers are getting greedy. If they kill the cable companies and satellite companies how are they going to get their programming to the viewer?
For instance ESPN is in over 70+ million homes in a hundred a fifty countries in fifteen languages. In addition to the roughly $5.00 per head they collect for every cable and satellite subscriber they sell $441 million in advertising.
While the technology is such that they could deliver all their programming using the internet could ESPN (Fox) generate nearly the revenue stream they have today? How many homes would be willing to pay $15 - $25 a month each for a family of Fox or ESPN channels?
While losing sports on the satellites would hurt those companies the cable companies are probably almost indifferent. They would still make money selling you the high speed internet connection on which they have an 85% gross profit margin vs. 50% on video. If the cable companies dropped both Fox and ESPN they could reduce their basic rate by $15 - $20 per month. This would be very popular with non sports fanatics and attract additional subscribers.
Without the revenue stream from 70+ million subs ESPN and other sports networks would not have the money to continue paying huge rights fees to leagues and teams.
All the stake holders better figure this out before all of their business models fall apart. There is a limit to what people will pay for sports and if Congress is forced to get involved and mandates ala carte offerings for all channels then that is the end of ESPN as we know it. It will become a niche channel. FOX and everyone else will have to sell themselves just like HBO and Showtime.
Jim
Huh? I'm fairly certain AT120 will exist even if Dish Network agrees to be like every other provider and add the Fox RSN's. That doesn't take away your choice, if the package still exists.
So about 1 year.Just got confirmation that the current contract between Fox and Direct does not end until well into 2011.
If Dish had the guts to be modify their business plan and drop all high priced sports channels (Fox ESPN Comcast , etc. ) Dish could cut the cost of all their packages by $10 - $20 bucks depending on how much they were marking the sports channels up.
While they would lose several million subscribers who are sports fanatics, how many subscribers would they gain from households that would find a hundred channel package for $23 - $28 very attractive? In my opinion they would gain more subscribers than they would loose.
Jim
I
While they would lose several million subscribers who are sports fanatics, how many subscribers would they gain from households that would find a hundred channel package for $23 - $28 very attractive? In my opinion they would gain more subscribers than they would loose.
Jim
Problem is, those sports channels control more than sports. Disney owns not only ESPN, but the Disney Channel and ABC Family. Fox has (obviously) FX, Nat Geo Wild, Fox Movie Channel, and so on. Comcast owns E!, Style, and G4 (not to mention Versus, but that is also a sports channel). Going without sports would also const them much other programming. I have to agree, your option sounds great, but programmers have already guarded against that.
Greg Bimson said:Huh? I'm fairly certain AT120 will exist even if Dish Network agrees to be like every other provider and add the Fox RSN's. That doesn't take away your choice, if the package still exists.
It might raise the price, but it didn't take away your choice. AT120 would still exist.HDRoberts said:Yes it does, as it will raise the price of that pack as expensive RSNs are added. Plus, I get to tell MLB, and NBA I don't care for overpriced sports by not subbing.
He just said well beyond 2010. It could be more than that. I doubt it thoughSo about 1 year.
Thats not that far away.
But, Most likly by then I'll be a cable subscriber, since they seem to be putting out more HD now then D*, and the carry comcast Philly in HD as well as Red Zone,YES,more locals HD DVR that can now use an external hard drive, 15 MBPS for what seems less then D* can offer.