So i'm of two minds about this. First, given the contract that customers signed, this strikes me as frivolous.
But on the flip side, the standard service contract is so one sided, that I'd love to see the courts treat the contract as a contract of adhesion such that the one sided aspects of the contract are disregarded.
A lot of people complain that they should be able to end their contract early without paying the ETF if Dish drops their "favorite channel." The only way I can see that ever coming about is through either government regulation or a court case like this.
Granted, the above is my best case scenario. Other than that, I don't see much utility in the suit.