Silly rabbit, I'm not here to make everyone's lives peaches and cream. If I wanted to help, I could. But you don't feed the pigeons, especially when they keep breeding.
I pointed out an obvious flaw in the argument for not paying what you owe. The fact that you're unhappy with a service doesn't relieve you of your obligation to pay for services consumed up until that point. That fact that you don't like it really doesn't enter into the issue.
Also, be careful with making assumptions. What I've said is FACT. It's fact for several reasons, but we'll go with reliable source and utilizes common sense for the time being... If I were Charlie Ergen himself (I'd have way too much time on my hands if I'm posting here instead of getting blitzed in Lodo) I'd very much be in a position to be helpful and contribute; ...as I see fit. Just an example, grain of salt and all. Or should I say, y'all?
Here's another fact. CSR's don't narc on CSR's in account notes. Dispute Resolution are a bunch of CSRs as well, just like Executive Resolution, just like Technical Support, and just like your second-cousin removed Jeb. A CSR can lose their job for stating another CSR "got into serious trouble", so it's a simple conclusion to draw that the OP was just told what they wanted to hear. That they were wronged and justice has been served. Again, common sense. I'm willing to share if you'd like some.