I mentioned in another post that my imagination must be running wild because the SD picture seems WAY better than with my 501. Topcats69 posted that it "probably does look better".
I've been watching for 3 days now. The picture IS better. For instance, there was always some VERY slight ghosting of captions on my local station pkg but no longer. That's the only change that I can describe other than the picture looks MUCH better (and it was EXCELLENT before).
The improvement COULD be due to using RGB cables instead of S-video but it seems TOO MUCH better to simply be different cables.
My question: the 622 setting is for 1080i. On an SD broadcast does the 622 'synthesize' (for lack of the correct term) pictures and send them to the TV at 1080i instead of 480i?
Phil
I've been watching for 3 days now. The picture IS better. For instance, there was always some VERY slight ghosting of captions on my local station pkg but no longer. That's the only change that I can describe other than the picture looks MUCH better (and it was EXCELLENT before).
The improvement COULD be due to using RGB cables instead of S-video but it seems TOO MUCH better to simply be different cables.
My question: the 622 setting is for 1080i. On an SD broadcast does the 622 'synthesize' (for lack of the correct term) pictures and send them to the TV at 1080i instead of 480i?
Phil