"Mike McCarthy" was trending on Twitter after the game. Accurate comparison, I'd say....Well, KC was too much for Buffalo. I don't know about Tampa. Their defense was able to make up for the offensive coaching that kept saying "throw it needlessly deep" instead of "run the ball, that is working and it kills clock". Of course, having a coach say, "You know what, let's play it safe. Why should we go for a touchdown from the eight yard line, where if we fail, Tampa regains the ball around the eight yard line, when we can just put not enough points on the board to avoid still needing to score a touchdown, and at best regaining the ball at our 40 yard line, at best, with maybe a timeout left and 30 seconds on the clock?"
Not quite kicking an extra point with time expiring on the clock and you are down by two, but that seemed to be some pretty bad decision making.
I'd say that in McCarthy's case, he went for it. Green Bay didn't. As a Pats fan, and an economics minded head coach, you learn to study risk-benefit and you always go for the benefit if the risk is small, and you never go for the benefit if it doesn't reduce risk of the outcome. The field goal provided no benefit and the risk was small as it gives Tampa the ball on the 1 to 8 yard line, assuming no sack. At least going for it on 4th and 1 gives you a chance to maintain possession."Mike McCarthy" was trending on Twitter after the game. Accurate comparison, I'd say....
Tom Brady taking another team to a SB in the first year. that's Hollywood stuff.
If he were to win it against a team that's the next new Thing...pinch me.
that would put him up in Babe Ruth, Bill Russell air. not that he isn't already.
Why would it be a middle finger to Belichick? New England managed those 9 Super Bowl appearances by managing their spending... and Brady not taking what he could have earned was a major piece of that success. Going to Tampa was Brady's final (first?) Payday.I give full credit to my brother-in-law for saying this, but after he said it to me it resonated to the point where I think it’s very plausible: If the Bucs win in 2 weeks, Brady calls it a career. He will have won a seemingly unattainable 7 Super Bowls. He would have won it on his new home field (something that’s never been done), and the icing on the cake would be a big middle finger to Bill Belichick. As you so correctly said, Hollywood stuff.
Sent from my iPhone using the SatelliteGuys app!
Brady and Belichick soured the past few years. There is no love loss between the two.Why would it be a middle finger to Belichick? New England managed those 9 Super Bowl appearances by managing their spending... and Brady not taking what he could have earned was a major piece of that success. Going to Tampa was Brady's final (first?) Payday.
Tampa's success is in part Brady's, but there are a lot of other short-term signed talent in Tampa, especially defense, making this happen. Brady is one important piece of the puzzle, but not the only. We saw this in New England, where the puzzle pieces finally just didn't fit. Brady couldn't make it happen. It was long overdue, they'd been awesome for so long.
Brady overstayed the system originally... but ended up winning a couple more Super Bowls in the process. Garapallo was supposed to be the next QB, but Brady stayed even longer, but his success definitely justified it, even if it hurt Patriot interests a little down the road.Brady and Belichick soured the past few years. There is no love loss between the two.
Belicheck underestimated Brady's staying power. He wanted to move on years ago but ownership wanted Brady. This is why he gave Garapallo way for nothing to the Niners. He was Belichick's future QB, Brady balked and ownership listened. The team is also old now. No receivers and an aging defense. They leveraged the farm to win but didn't look to the future. They have no QB plan and have to build from scratch.Brady overstayed the system originally... but ended up winning a couple more Super Bowls in the process. Garapallo was supposed to be the next QB, but Brady stayed even longer, but his success definitely justified it, even if it hurt Patriot interests a little down the road.
I have no idea the internal situation, as I don't bother with gossip. Personally, I'm happy Brady has cemented his legacy as GOAT by taking the Bucs to the Super Bowl.
I don't see Tom being like that. Tom wanted a 2 year deal Bill and Bob said 1 year. Tom was likely disappointed at that time but has long forgotten.the icing on the cake would be a big middle finger to Bill Belichick.
Why would it be a middle finger to Belichick? New England managed those 9 Super Bowl appearances by managing their spending... and Brady not taking what he could have earned was a major piece of that success. Going to Tampa was Brady's final (first?) Payday.
Tampa's success is in part Brady's, but there are a lot of other short-term signed talent in Tampa, especially defense, making this happen. Brady is one important piece of the puzzle, but not the only. We saw this in New England, where the puzzle pieces finally just didn't fit. Brady couldn't make it happen. It was long overdue, they'd been awesome for so long.
Brady wanted out, he got the output in his contract. They never thought he would leave.I don't see Tom being like that. Tom wanted a 2 year deal Bill and Bob said 1 year. Tom was likely disappointed at that time but has long forgotten.
just doesn't fit his positive personality..... holding on. he might snicker a bit
I don't know if TB's defense can beat the Chiefs.
I would be at all surprised to see Garoppolo back in New England .Belicheck underestimated Brady's staying power. He wanted to move on years ago but ownership wanted Brady. This is why he gave Garapallo way for nothing to the Niners. He was Belichick's future QB, Brady balked and ownership listened. The team is also old now. No receivers and an aging defense. They leveraged the farm to win but didn't look to the future. They have no QB plan and have to build from scratch.