bryan92 said:Does anyone know if the OTA analog picture was fixed?
MaSat said:I worked in a place that sells HD receivers and I've seen at least a few of them does this. When that happen the channel remapped to the real frequency number. Go to http://www.antennaweb.org to find out what is the real frequency assignment of the channel.
melvis1907 said:Hey Tide,
Now that the locals are mapping in the guide, is there anyway to tie the OTA channels into the mapped locals? I went throught the manual again last night and couldn't do it. My wife gets confused by the whole station call letter thing. Someone please help me get her off my back!! :shocked
The 148 issue is still here. I had hoped it would be fixed with this release but no luck.bcshields said:Does anyone still have issues with 148? Did this software fix it? (or am I asking too early and the west coasters haven't woken up yet?)
bcshields said:Does anyone still have issues with 148? Did this software fix it? (or am I asking too early and the west coasters haven't woken up yet?)
I still have the issue with OTA after viewing it for over hour. When I switch to a satellite channel, instead of getting the "Acquiring Satellite signal" message, it goes through the 5 checks of each satellite location.
sat717 said:I got the new upgrade, but 49% problem still exists. I saw all local channels under 100 but CBS and WB get stuck at 49%.
I'm still having the problem on ch12.1. Methinks it is mainly occurring on VHF digital channels, but I could be wrong.Sparkman said:Sat717,
I'm curious, are both of those 2 channels multicasting? I have only hads the problem on channels that are & 264 fixed it on 2 of the 3 that I was having the problem on.
Grandude said:I'm still having the problem on ch12.1. Methinks it is mainly occurring on VHF digital channels, but I could be wrong.