why is that digi? please explain and thank you for explanationDon't get hung up on the fact that adding another satellite means adding more bandwidth. It doesn't always work that way.
why is that digi? please explain and thank you for explanationDon't get hung up on the fact that adding another satellite means adding more bandwidth. It doesn't always work that way.
Two bits of info:
- Dish does not have any current plans to do 24/7 HD RSNs. They do re-evaluate the situation regularly, and so they can change their mind at any time.
Wasn't it announced by Scott about a year or two ago that Charlie wouldn't to launch 24/7 RSN's, and it was going to happen soon (at the time)?
whitewolf8214 said:why is that digi? please explain and thank you for explanation
why is that digi? please explain and thank you for explanation
Statement 1 is true, but not number 2.Two bits of info:
- Dish does not have any current plans to do 24/7 HD RSNs. They do re-evaluate the situation regularly, and so they can change their mind at any time.
- When a game on an RSN is in HD on a different provider, and not in HD on Dish, it is almost always because the channel is not providing the HD feed to Dish. This is an ongoing problem between some RSNs and Dish that they are working on solving.
There is 500 MHz of bandwidth at each slot in the DBS band. A new sat does not add to that. New DBS sats will broadcast on the same frequencies as the old sats. However, a new sat might use or enable bandwith to be used more efficently, so there can be marginally more space.
You can use a new sat. For replacement of old ones. You can use only so many satellites.
- When a game on an RSN is in HD on a different provider, and not in HD on Dish, it is almost always because the channel is not providing the HD feed to Dish. This is an ongoing problem between some RSNs and Dish that they are working on solving.
Nope. It was announced by Chucky himself. You are half right though, it hasn't happened yet.
The only way E14 will give more space on 119 for CONUS (it does have a lot more spot beam antennas and will help with LiL) is for it to be more powerful than the satellite it replaces. If it is powerful enough Dish can cut the error correction down some.
If they convert the QPSK (sd) to 7/8 from 5/6 maybe they could free up enough space for a transponder to be converted to HD. This conversion only gives them about 4.2% more space per converted TP. They have 14 TPs running at 5/6. This is not a full TP, but perhaps they could shuffle channels with 110 or something to free up one.
A bigger gain would be conversion from 8PSK 2/3 to 8PSK 3/4 which would give them 9% more per TP. But there is only 1 TP on 119 with no channels running 8PSK.
The big thing is that they will not need the empty TP on 119 once the new satellite is in place, that will be more room.
So, all in all, very unlikely they will really gain more space with the new satellite, except for 2.5X more capacity in local spot beams for LiL.
So if they do everything right, you could pull those 2 into spotbeams, convert to 7/8, and then they have the empty TP on 119 now. So almost 4 TP's of CONUS space will be available after the transition. Now the big question, will they use it as CONUS or convert another frequency into spotbeams creating even more bandwidth. But is it needed now with E10 and Ciel2 also offering a ton of beams? Probably not for right now.
Since there is not an announced satellite for WA between now and the deadline to carry all LiL HD channels in markets they carry, it is hard to say if they need the capacity or not. If Dish does plan to carry all 210 markets with significantly viewed allowed (if the current legislation passes), they might need the spot beam space.