The signal is indeed being scaled to 720p or 1080i.
HOWEVER:
The upscaling is not being done by a high end scaler and compression of the SD channel WILL effect how poorly that scaling will look.
Where do you get that information from?
The signal is indeed being scaled to 720p or 1080i.
HOWEVER:
The upscaling is not being done by a high end scaler and compression of the SD channel WILL effect how poorly that scaling will look.
Where do you get that information from?
To change the resolution would be up-scaling not upconversion. I'm pretty confident that the 622 is not capable of scaling a 480i format to 1080i or 720p.
I would love to be proven wrong, however.
Edit: The upconversion is so that a 480i signal can be output through HD outputs.
When you set the TV Type, the signal is SCALED to that resolution. There is a Broadcom chip in your 622 that does this.
Here is a paragraph of copy from a DVDO Scaler webpage:
Why does anyone need a scaler? Well, for one thing, it will generally do a much better job than your display or upscaling DVD player will when converting and sizing (scaling) low video resolution sources to your high resolution display. If your Standard definition sources like Cable or Satellite, VCR or Laserdisk look awful on your HD Television or projector, you can clean them up considerably with a high quality video scaler.
High end systems like DVDO also contain signal processing circuitry to improve the picture as well as scale(convert and size) it.
What does this screen have to do with SD output?
It's not like CSI where you can process a fuzzy picture and read the license plates on a car that was barely distinguishable before.
I did a lot of research on this subject when looking for a receiver with HDMI switching. It was in this research that I frequently came across upconversion and up-scaling being two different things. I assumed the same would apply with the 622.
Good, "quad video scalars " - to bad we don't have more then that technical details.