From DSLreports.com
A La Carte a Good Idea Afterall
In 2004 the FCC issued a report based on cable-industry data that claimed "a la carte" cable pricing (being able to pick and choose your cable channels) was not economical. In late 2005, pressured by indecency groups and IPTV telcos eager to disrupt the current broadcasting business model, the FCC pulled a 180. Today the FCC released a new report lauding the pricing scheme (see press release and the report itself, both in pdf), and attacking the previous study as flawed and "biased".
A La Carte a Good Idea Afterall
In 2004 the FCC issued a report based on cable-industry data that claimed "a la carte" cable pricing (being able to pick and choose your cable channels) was not economical. In late 2005, pressured by indecency groups and IPTV telcos eager to disrupt the current broadcasting business model, the FCC pulled a 180. Today the FCC released a new report lauding the pricing scheme (see press release and the report itself, both in pdf), and attacking the previous study as flawed and "biased".
"The Further Report finds that the 2004 report also relied upon unrealistic assumptions and presented biased analysis in concluding that a la carte “would not produce the desired result of lower MVPD rates for most pay-television households.” The Further Report identifies mistaken calculations in the Booz Allen Study, which was originally submitted by the cable industry for Commission consideration."
The new data indicates cable and satellite customers could see their bills fall by as much as 13% if the pricing scheme was implemented. Not only could the new pricing scheme reduce prices, it could increase demand for services, the report concludes. </B></I>story continues..
Last edited: