This has been on the tech front pages for a few days.
First the duo was accused of backroom deal making to kill net neutrality and later both denied anything of this nature
Google and Verizon sign net neutrality agreement, begin the end of net neutrality? (update: Google, Verizon deny claims) -- Engadget
Here is another take on this activity by Bob Cringely
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/opinion/08cringeley.html?_r=1
Sounds plausible...
Diogen.
First the duo was accused of backroom deal making to kill net neutrality and later both denied anything of this nature
Google and Verizon sign net neutrality agreement, begin the end of net neutrality? (update: Google, Verizon deny claims) -- Engadget
Here is another take on this activity by Bob Cringely
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/opinion/08cringeley.html?_r=1
Google’s agreement with Verizon could very well be merely a way for Google to get its data closer to users, by dropping its shipping containers into Verizon data centers, or perhaps their parking lots.
...With servers so close to users, Google could not only send its data faster but also avoid sending it over the Internet backbone that connects service providers and for which they all pay. This would save space for other traffic — and money for both Verizon and Google, as their backbone bills decline (wishful thinking, but theoretically possible). Net neutrality would be not only intact, but enhanced.
...Why wouldn’t the companies just tell us what they’re up to? If my guess is right, then I would think they’re silent because it’s a secret. They’d rather their competitors not know until a few hundred shipping containers are in place — and suddenly YouTube looks more like HBO.
Sounds plausible...
Diogen.