Cherrypicking is fine, until it affects you.
The idea that cable (and by the way the tech works, sat too) must provide service to an entire area while the phone companies can waltz in and just give service to who they want is wrong. The cost to deploy FIOS is no greater than it was to do cable Internet. Don't buy the phone company BS that they need special help!
Imagine how many people might be willing to pay for the service, but they live in an area with too many "poor" people. There are all sorts of people I know of that have rennovated old downtown homes and can afford to pay for the top tier of services. However, when you look at the downtown area, there are a lot of "poor" people as well. So those customers that live there AND can pay for the service get passed up.
The other part of this is that the "poor" people STAY poor. Without the compitition from the phone company, the cable company will keep their rates high.
In the end, the person to blame isn't the phone company. Blame the lawmakers that bought the BS and changed the laws so the phone company could get away with this.
jUst like anything we "want", FiOS is NOT an entitlement..I cannot get it right now..Does that mean I have the right to seek the use of the courts to make my local phone company provide a service that that company had not intended for me to obtain?
I don't know what you refer to when you say satellite has to provide service to all..But I will tell you this, if my employer becomes aware that a potential customer(sale) resides in a high crime area, we will decline the business..
"The cost to deploy FiOS is no greater than it was to do cable Internet." Really..Where's your data to support that claim?...BTW this nothing to do with cable internet as a standalone product..
I can walk right across the street and get the straight dope on thnat..And I will tell you right off that my friend across the street is a manager for Sprint and all he works on is fiber. He has told what is costs just to find and repair and excavation cut....Try $100,000. That's the average cost....Now do want to me to ask him which is more expensive, FOC or.500/.750 single aluminum conductor transmission cable for CATV? Or do you want to just back off that assertion about the costs being the same?...
So now that we have that out of the way. I would like to know why it is you think that a business must be compelled to attempt to sell it's wares in an area where there is little potential customer base?
Sounds to me like you have a bone to pick with the phone companies.....I politely request we do not discuss your griveances with telcos.
If one chooses to live in an economically challenged part of town and they people of means that is their choice..The business has no choice but to research the market and determine whether a cross section of the market is within their target deomgraphic, or not.. I don't think it is very prudent for a business to look at the scenario you put forth and say "Oops, there's a upper middle class guy who renovated a town house down on Cherry Street that wants FiOS, let's spend a few hundred thousand to wire the whole neighborhood"..
Whether the cable company in a given area has competition or not isn't going to change the economic status of anyone..Quite frankly people living on shoestring budgets should be doing a better job prioritizing their spending..That means pay tv for most of these people is a frill.
The phone company isn't "getting away" with anything...Look at it from the other angle. It would be then safe to say that the cable companies allowed this to happen to them..They allowed the politicians to tell them how to do business..I would be willing to wager a few bucks that if cable tv wanted to with it's ultra powerful lobby in DC get some rules changed and perhaps get the same rules as the telcos, they could do just that...
Remember one important item..The telcos have to provide the availability of their service to EVERY home in their service areas..Cable tv only has to go where there is a certain home density..In the case of the county I live in Time Warner must provide cable plant whenver the density of homes reaches 18 houses per one mile of roadway....That still leaves 40% of the county uncabled. Imagine the furor if the cable co's had to play by the same rules that the telcos do....I am not sure but I would imagine the govt allowed the exception because the telco system already covers so much territory....