The channels in the 70's. If you are getting the ones in the 200's, then you are fine
awesome; I don't get any channels in the 70's
The channels in the 70's. If you are getting the ones in the 200's, then you are fine
That D* will never use off the 110. Unless they go around and start replacing everones SL3 LNBs that they just went around and put up.Thats 18 channels of HD.
Just splitting hairs, but it's only 15 right? I thought D* was 5 per tp
That D* will never use off the 110. Unless they go around and start replacing everones SL3 LNBs that they just went around and put up.
Even better thats 24 more HD channels.What I thought. E* is actually up to 8 per tp (IIRC), which can be obvious at times.
I respect your opinion but disagree that the difference is minimal. especially on larger screens.The difference is minimal at best. I've switched back and forth tons of times as well, And I'll take variety/and value over the slight difference in HD PQ.
I respect your opinion but disagree that the difference is minimal. especially on larger screens.
Agreed. 32", no. 55", yes.
The difference is minimal at best. I've switched back and forth tons of times as well, And I'll take variety/and value over the slight difference in HD PQ.
Which is why HD will never be the same again. All providers know most households do not have larger HDTV's, and even more do not care as much about PQ. Its sad, but not going to change, because I'll never have FIOS here.
That is correct.I think Scott may have been referring to what E* might do with the space if they took it from D*.
On the bright side, HD quality will probably at least stay where it is as the bits are squeezed further. Encoders will only get better/more efficient with time.
I doubt you will see it downressed past where it is now. Just probably a better encoder and an extra channel per transponder.