does a satellite with a low fec rate give you a better chance at being successful at minibud testing,say with a 1 meter offset and conical scaler? possibly a bird like amc1 ?
the lower the number (1/2 being the lowest and 9/10 being the highest) the less signal you need to keep it stable
Good example I always used was Equity Broadcasting (when it was around). The feeds they had on 123W KU were 3/4 FEC so on my Pansat 1500 a 30-35 quality was minimum for threshold. The mux they had on 95W C-Band was 7/8 FEC which required at least a 75 quality on the meter. Anything lower and you had pixeling.
When White Springs was around on 129W KU they were 1/2 FEC. That could be stable at 10 quality
Using AMC1 as example RFD TV comes in more stable on the 6 footer (2/3 FEC) than Americas Auction at 5/6 FEC.
But just because FEC is low that doesnt mean it will come in on a smaller than recommended dish
And the FEC is a part of the signal being uplinked-not the satellite itself. It is just one part of the process. And it gets too complicated for me to want to think about, lol.
A low number like 1/2 means that for every 1 bit of data, 2 bits are transmitted.
This is a large amount of error correction, the signal has 50% error correction, "High FEC"
A high number like 9/10 means that for every 9 bits of data, 10 bits are transmitted.
This is a small amount of error correction, the signal has only 10% error correction, "Low FEC"