I'm starting this thread because we were discussing this in another thread that went political and got deleted.
Anyhow, there used to be science on the Science Channel, and for that matter most all the Discovery channels, as well as NatGeo and History. There used to be a great Discovery Health channel with many interesting programs. Sold to Oprah. I know another member mentioned Discovery Kids...
I also mentioned (in that other thread) that at least NOVA and Nature are still on PBS. Any other educational channels that aren't dominated by reality pap? (Oh, and I also insulted the viewing public for watching reality programs at all... I hope that wasn't why the thread was deleted.)
What is wrong with the History Channel? They seem to fixate on Ancient Aliens. This is supposed to be a history channel and there is NO evidence that aliens exist.
I haven't watched mythbusters and through the wormhole in years, and was planning on catching up at some point. Sounds like I don't need to.
I remember watching an interesting Seminar on chemistry and the attempts to build the biggest atom on the U Cal channel. Was a nice thing to fall onto.Ouch! You peeled the scab off, big time
I have the alleged "America's Everything...." A few years ago, we used to get the Research Channel, University of Washington, University of California, et al.
Yes. For some reason, they show ST:TNG on BBCA.Yeah. Now there's wrestling on the SyFy channel. What nonsense! Is Star Trek the series still available anywhere? Or have science fiction fans all died of old age?
Yeah; it's jaw-dropping incredible. And that jackass with the wild hairdo... I think he deliberately tries to make himself look as crazy as possible.
What is wrong with the History Channel?
They seem to fixate on Ancient Aliens. This is supposed to be a history channel and there is NO evidence that aliens exist.
Stone age technology is just better built than modern technology. It's just how it is. No wonder only stone age technology survived from the past.
Cost is king. That is the difference today. In fact, cutting corners to create a disposable technology and maximize profits is just what has caused a decline in reliability over the last few decades, which is a microcosm of thousands of years of "progress."This is not stone age but close.
The Romans built bridges which are still in use but here in Cincinnati they all think that our I75 bridge built in the 1960s is in dire need of replacement.
Where did all the knowledge about building bridges go in 2000 years?
The only thread of connection I see there is that Patrick Stewart is British.Yes. For some reason, they show ST:TNG on BBCA.
The only thread of connection I see there is that Patrick Stewart is British.
That was the episode that made me remove Through the Wormhole from my timer's list. Why? Because YEARS ago, Nova did a FANTASTIC show about the Dover trial. It demonstrated how irreducible complexity was shown to be incorrect, and proven beyond all doubt as fraud in federal court.I personally didn't like how Through the Wormhole didn't seem to verbally smack Michael Behe with his "irreducible complexity" garbage. The people that followed certainly took it apart, but the show didn't take a stand on the incredible stupidity that is the infalsifiable scientific 'theory' of "intelligent design".
What's even scarier is History now gets very high ratings, comparable to popular cable networks like TNT, TBS and ESPN. Stupidity is profitable.History is driving religious fanaticism and generally providing false info. I hate this because people watch that channel and assume it to be true without looking it up. I made it a point about a year ago to look info up on every documentary shown on the history channel and the misinformation was scary.