Who streams MPEG2?Roku needs to be more Cord Cutter friendly and support Mpeg 2 decoding.
Who streams MPEG2?
There are many competent streamers that do handle MPEG2. I fancy that Roku devices would be considerably more expensive if they had to support all the outdated formats.
Might be outdated but OTA still uses it. Besides they can also allow software decoding like the inexpensive fire stickWho streams MPEG2?
There are many competent streamers that do handle MPEG2. I fancy that Roku devices would be considerably more expensive if they had to support all the outdated formats.
Who streams MPEG2?
There are many competent streamers that do handle MPEG2. I fancy that Roku devices would be considerably more expensive if they had to support all the outdated formats.
Yep, Like to try a Roku. Doesn't work with a Hdhomerun.HD Homerun OTA streamer
If you "streaming" OTA from a tuner, you should probably consider using a transcoding media server like Plex. Of course then you can use tuners that are much less costly and can be upgraded without paying an arm and a leg when the next TV standard takes over.
With a media server you can also easily add other streaming channels and music that the Silicon Dust products don't have access to and you can do it all from one place.
Who streams MPEG2?
The "limitation" seems to be with using just a bare HD Homerun without a media server. In this day and age of multiple tuners, it seems like a tuner should provide the transcoding to limit the volume of network traffic on home LANs.I was only using the HD Homerun tuner as an example of one limitation of the Roku
How large a percentage of the population do you imagine are using these sources that don't have some method of transcoding in place? With DVDs you've almost certainly ripped them and can easily transcode them (good ripping tools offer transcoding as part of the ripping process).DVD movies, OTA, and my first camcorder.
If only it just worked (or you didn't already have an alternative in place).I hate to dump everything that I have that just works, and pay more $, so that I can keep up with "progress".
And that's fine as long as you accept that there are sacrifices (and costs) involved and that it will only get worse as the rest of the World continues forward. Going with a real media server may have been more expensive up front (unless you had a suitable computer laying around) but buying non-modular solutions will get you on the back end.The reason I went with a hdhomerun instead of a device like a Tablo is because I don't want to transcode.
And that's fine as long as you accept that there are sacrifices (and costs) involved and that it will only get worse as the rest of the World continues forward. Going with a real media server may have been more expensive up front (unless you had a suitable computer laying around) but buying non-modular solutions will get you on the back end.
Fortunately for you, I suspect that ATSC 3.0 is quite a few years away (although there will probably be more than a few DTV re-scans required to keep up with the repack and added/deleted channels).
For the other 99.9998% of the population that isn't swimming against the current, AVC support and later is just dandy.
I think that we can agree at least to the proposition that supporting the HD Homerun probably isn't sufficient reason to go to all that trouble