Yup, it has a noise figure of 0.5, while most of recent ku lineal LNBs have 0.2 or even 0.1, a universal Ku LNB usually has 0.3 db.
It should be clarified that your statement is made from "Published Specs" and not something you know or have tested.
My experience with that LNB left much to be desired, A LOT, it was marketed as a Lineal/Circular LNB and until now that i've read Iceberg's post from early this year, i've figured it's not a Lineal/Circular.
I tried to get the channels with it at 123ºW but it was pretty much awful.
I just decided to tell the store were i bought it that it didn't work as specified since i could not get a single lineal channel, the guy at the store contacted his dealer and the response they gave him was "oh it's not a lineal/circular, the package was wrong, we sent you low frequency circular LNBs designed for people who get tv circunventing DN's security to watch channels at 118.8ºW" (as in h@ckw@re).
They offered my money back so i ordered an Invacom Lineal/Circular and it was good, then again, it's a good brand, and the installation is running really well, or at least that's what i've been told.
Before that I compared the Digiwave to a 0.1db Eagle Aspen, a 0.2 db Chaparral, and an older 0.5 db Chaparral Quad, the Quad had a very poor response, while the other two were really good.
So in restrospective, in my experience using commercial grade LNBs:
0.1db > 0.2db > 0.5db
Nowadays i've been hearing a lot about a spitfire lineal LNB but i had not tested that one.
In the other hand, a friend told me about this same LNB, he was interested in catching 118ºW, and what i heard from him is that he configured it as 10500 instead of 10600 or 10750, you know, like those directv latino LNBs, and alas, he got what he wanted.
M.