L4.47 Coming Soon to a 622 Near You

  • Server Issues.

    We are very aware that there have been system issues the past few days. In troubleshooting the system, it has been determined that the issue is at our provider and is hardware related. The provider was going to move us to a new server, however we are now told by the provider the issue is at the data center in St. Louis. They have offered to move us to a different datacenter on the East Coast or West Coast, however at this time we have declined the move to a different data center as it would affect the speed of connecting to about half our members.

    We are waiting for more information from our provider, however we are trying to ride this out to stay in the same data center, so that when the server is fixed all users in the US will get the fastest connection possible.

    If after some time the issue is not resolved we will be forced to move to another data center, if this happens there will be down time, as they will need to transfer everything to the new server and we will need to update the DNS and other settings for the new IP address of the new server. If we have to do this, the time it will take to move will be out of our hands.

    We are going to try our best to weather through this, so we thank you in advance if you encounter any issues.

    Sorry for the issue!
    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
I have L4.47

I just checked my 622 and it has been updated to L4.47. I have ALL my OTA audio back and my System Info check now says all my LNBs are good! That's really all I could find wrong last week. Right now it seems the audio level is better; less difference between HD stations and SD stations. Will have to see if it's really fixed or one of those "sometimes" things.
 
My 622's got L447 (the ones with 446).

Haven't tested it yet, but a quick check seems to say it fixed it.

Based on RandallA's posting in the updates thread, any receiver that had 446 should now have 447.

LER
 
UNfortunately it still comes with DishONLINE. :)

That's OK, I can ignore the feature just like I do their previous ill conceived and executed VOD. Dish needs to go back to the drawing board or follow D* example, this thing in its current form is an embarrassment.

NightRyder
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts

Top