why? less chance of signal loss due to a big obstruction (feed assy.). especially for a small reflector. si?I think it is a useless creation. I see no point to go this way.
I think it is a useless creation. I see no point to go this way.
So, a simple 1.2m offset antenna will perform better than this one.
Very simple...such a setup will diminish performance of the antenna at least 3-4 times. So, a simple 1.2m offset antenna will perform better than this one. That is why it is a useless creation, IMHO.
why the DBS services, Dish, DTV, etc, chose to use offset LNBF's with their small reflectors
Performance is not diminished because they are designed as offset dishes.The purpose of the offset is so the feed does not block the signal from getting to the reflector when dealing with the tiny ku/ka wavelenghts.Despite having owned large C-band dishes years ago, I claim no dish expertise. That said, does anyone have some insight as to why the DBS services, Dish, DTV, etc, chose to use offset LNBF's with their small reflectors if it diminishes performance?
Ok, but the reflectors seem to be concentric, just as they would be for a prime focus LNB set. The smaller 10-12" dishes used in the Winegard and King auto aiming dishes use a double reflecting prime focus LNB. The design decisions must be interesting.Performance is not diminished because they are designed as offset dishes.The purpose of the offset is so the feed does not block the signal from getting to the reflector when dealing with the tiny ku/ka wavelenghts.
Ok, but the reflectors seem to be concentric, just as they would be for a prime focus LNB set. The smaller 10-12" dishes used in the Winegard and King auto aiming dishes use a double reflecting prime focus LNB. The design decisions must be interesting.
Ok, yeah, the snow consideration does make sense as a design decision factor. The small 10"-12" dishes used in the portable auto aiming setups are enclosed in typically round housings, so it's not a factor with them.With an offset feed, the signal comes in from a higher point. Therefore the dish does not need to be tipped up as far to get the same signal. I think this could be a design decision. This can be a big advantage for reliability, especially up north. Not having the dish fill up with heavy snow, wet leaves, etc. near as often. The customer base for small dish isn't tinkerers, they just need it to work without messing with it or even thinking about it. With an offset feed on a concentric dish, if the signal is less than optimal, it's still better than asking the customer to keep cleaning it out. The newer small dishes are probably optimized for the offset.
In the wintertime, especially when there's a storm coming, I typically park my big dish to a lower satellite when I'm not using it, so I don't have to go clean it out as often.
With an offset feed on a concentric dish, if the signal is less than optimal