Their fiscal year ends in March. Here's a report on year 2006-2007.I see quarterly losses but net profit for the year. am i looking in the wrong place.
Macworld | PS3 losses drive Sony profits down
Their fiscal year ends in March. Here's a report on year 2006-2007.I see quarterly losses but net profit for the year. am i looking in the wrong place.
Signature Joe post - nothing to do with reality......Sony is currently making money on every PS3 being sold right now. And Sony did not lose billions...
Sony Computer Entertainment swung to a profit, after having incurred billions in losses over the past several quarters. Registering operating income of ~$133 million (12.9 billion yen) on record quarterly revenues of over $5 billion, an aggressive cost-cutting campaign in the manufacture of the Playstation 3 was the primary factor in coming out of the red. Playstation 2 operations continue to be the source of the largest profit for SCE, although operating profit from PS2 has declined on reduced sales of software for the system; profits generated from PSP operations themselves increased on increased sales of the hardware.
Signature Joe post - nothing to do with reality...
Latest quarter report
Beyond3D - Sony reports third quarter earnings, gaming turns profit
Summary:
-Sony did lose billions over the last fiscal year;
-PS3 still loses money (but less than before);
-PS2 and PSP made the gaming division turn profit.
Diogen.
Their fiscal year ends in March. Here's a report on year 2006-2007.
Macworld | PS3 losses drive Sony profits down
But by then those DOCIS 3.0 modems will be fully entrenched. Many people will have up to 100 MB downloading by then.
But by then those DOCIS 3.0 modems will be fully entrenched. Many people will have up to 100 MB downloading by then.
There is throttling on the current backbone, but by the end of 2009 as I said with the new modems there won't be a need for the ISP's to throttle bandwidth. Other industrialized countries are far ahead of us with bandwidth. I see no reason with the tech available why it won't roll out soon. FIOS already provides fiber to the home the new 3.0 modems are needed to compete.Nonrev,
2009 cable modems will deliver 100MB, Baaa haaa. The new trend in Cable based internet is Bandwidth throttling. Comcrap and a couple of others are throttling back bandwidth to power users, and users that have a separate VOIP service through different providers. If you have Comcrap and download alot of movies or other content then you are VERY likely to lose at least half of your bandwidth. Comcrap isn't the only provider doing this, several more providers are also considering the same strategy, or huge surcharges.
100MB may come, but it will be expensive and likely severely throttled if you use it to download a lot of Video content that is NOT provided by your Internet Provider.
John
There is throttling on the current backbone, but by the end of 2009 as I said with the new modems there won't be a need for the ISP's to throttle bandwidth.
There is throttling on the current backbone, but by the end of 2009 as I said with the new modems there won't be a need for the ISP's to throttle bandwidth. Other industrialized countries are far ahead of us with bandwidth. I see no reason with the tech available why it won't roll out soon. FIOS already provides fiber to the home the new 3.0 modems are needed to compete.
What 'backbone' are you talking about? Unless something changed since I left the network business there is no such thing, the internet is a bunch of different backbone networks owned by a number of different ISP's which interconnect with each other at peering points.
Exactly. And any "throttling" is not on the backbone, it's at the access point. The ISP's still have to pay someone somewhere for their own access to the internet, which all of their customers then share.
In order to provide those kinds of download speeds to everyone they'd have to increase their pipe in turn, and pass those costs on to someone (you). In general, the cost of bandwidth is going down, but we're not going to go from 1.5Mbps-10Mbps (most people don't even have that much) to 100Mbps in one year - at least not for the average consumer.
For the record I don't believe that downloads are going to replace HDM for a number of years.
Regarding the bandwidth issue, IMHO compression technologies will evolve faster than bandwidth capacity will expand.
What twisting are you guys trying. Obviously there will be a cooperative amongst the ISP’s or companies like Comcast was lying when they said 100 MB was to come. I didn’t say 1 year, I said by the end of 2009 the new 3.0 modems would be rolled out. Define backbone as you like.
Compression technologies will equally beneift downloads.
Compression technologies will equally beneift downloads.
What twisting are you guys trying. Obviously there will be a cooperative amongst the ISP’s or companies like Comcast was lying when they said 100 MB was to come. I didn’t say 1 year, I said by the end of 2009 the new 3.0 modems would be rolled out. Define backbone as you like.
Compression technologies will equally beneift downloads.