Is it safe to assume yet that HD-Lite is here to stay?
- Thread starter waltinvt
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 37
- Views 6K
I have Dish only to get the Voom channels, with cable being my main provider. Even those few HD channels I have in common between Dish and cable (DHD, ESPN HD, HDnet, etc.) look better on cable. If I could get my few favorite Voom channels on cable, I would dump Dish and never look back.
I have downgraded my Dish subscription since December. I am now paying $24/month less than I did on Dec 1. I have not yet upgraded to a 622, and may not for a while yet.
So I haven't rolled over yet on the HD-lite issue. I like the content of several of the VOOM channels and while the quality from them is decent, it is not the eye candy that is available from my OTA channels.
So I haven't rolled over yet on the HD-lite issue. I like the content of several of the VOOM channels and while the quality from them is decent, it is not the eye candy that is available from my OTA channels.
I agree completely! My HD LiLs are still far off in the future. Since my OTA options are apparently very limited I would be interested in one of the new MPEG-4 receivers just to receive the HD LiLs, but in my case there's no hurry. I don't see much else in the 7 new M-4 HD channels from E* that warrants the extra cost right now. When the HD LiLs and/or more meaningful content are available that require the M-4 equipment then I'll be more inclined to bite. (Besides - I'm apparetly stuck with the 811 for a full 12-mo. commitment until next Dec.) I like some of the 16 HD E* channels I currently receive for content if not for PQ.Tom Bombadil said:
Right now my best (and, unfortately, ONLY) HD OTA channel (PBS) is by far the best HD signal I receive PQ-wise. Too bad there's not much on there I want to watch, but it's great to at least have what I believe is a full HD source as a benchmark.
No changes to report to any of the resolutions or bitrates really.
All 720p channels are sent native.
DiscoveryHD, HBO-HD, SHO-HD, HDNet, HDNet Movies, TNT HD, and Universal-HD are sent natively 1920x1080i. The HDPPV (which includes all the nfl, nhl, nba, event ch) channel is 1920x1080 as well.
Voom and the HD local channels are another story. Voom is still 1280x1080i. HD Locals are 720p for fox and abc, 1440x1080i for nbc and cbs.
Supposedly we are still waiting for fiber upgrades before voom will go to 1920x1080i. We'll see about that. So far no comment from dish about CBS and NBC downres'ing.
All 720p channels are sent native.
DiscoveryHD, HBO-HD, SHO-HD, HDNet, HDNet Movies, TNT HD, and Universal-HD are sent natively 1920x1080i. The HDPPV (which includes all the nfl, nhl, nba, event ch) channel is 1920x1080 as well.
Voom and the HD local channels are another story. Voom is still 1280x1080i. HD Locals are 720p for fox and abc, 1440x1080i for nbc and cbs.
Supposedly we are still waiting for fiber upgrades before voom will go to 1920x1080i. We'll see about that. So far no comment from dish about CBS and NBC downres'ing.
Regarding HD LIL in the my area (Washington DC) here are my observations:
1. FOX - looks close to the real thing (OTA) and I've noticed no video/audio problems...excellent!
2. ABC - a little soft at times with only a few video/audio problems...ok, but needs improvement!
3. NBC - soft, audio/video problems...poor!
4. CBS - very soft, always audio/video problems, trailing video (the LSD affect)...gouge your eyes out horrible!
There's hope for the 720p channels (ABC, FOX)), but the 1080i channels (CBS, NBC) need serious encoder work. There has been a number of complaints about the 1080i channels (and several calls have been placed into D*), but does anyone know what's being done to correct the problem?
1. FOX - looks close to the real thing (OTA) and I've noticed no video/audio problems...excellent!
2. ABC - a little soft at times with only a few video/audio problems...ok, but needs improvement!
3. NBC - soft, audio/video problems...poor!
4. CBS - very soft, always audio/video problems, trailing video (the LSD affect)...gouge your eyes out horrible!
There's hope for the 720p channels (ABC, FOX)), but the 1080i channels (CBS, NBC) need serious encoder work. There has been a number of complaints about the 1080i channels (and several calls have been placed into D*), but does anyone know what's being done to correct the problem?
The Dish LA local HD channels seem to be good quality.
I can't get CBS or FOX OTA, but the OTA NBC and ABC PQ looks as good as Dish's.
I can't get CBS or FOX OTA, but the OTA NBC and ABC PQ looks as good as Dish's.
Yea Ken I can echo your observation about LA and NYC HD locals. Those two are also still transmitted in mpeg2 for what its worth. I still would like to see NBC and CBS transmitted in 1920x1080 instead of 1440x1080.
Riffjim4069: Haven't heard anything from dish regarding trying to fix the washington, DC HD local problems. If anyone else can report in from other locations it would be interesting to see what locations have which problems.
Riffjim4069: Haven't heard anything from dish regarding trying to fix the washington, DC HD local problems. If anyone else can report in from other locations it would be interesting to see what locations have which problems.
rlarryvt said:
As with most anyplace in Vt, it's not how far you are from the station, it's which side of the hill you're on
.If you're in Barre, have you checked with Adelphia cable? I'm pretty sure they've got WCAX-DT and some other HD channels.
What about channels 24 & 25 from Mt Ascutney ? Have you got a shot at them ? I get good signals for both of them from Bradford. One is the Vt PBS digital group, 24-1 & 24-5, of which 24-5 is HD; and the other is NBC from WNNE-DT at 25-1. Both have a real decent HD picture.
Boy dont I know about what side of the hill being in groton I have the mountains btw you and I walt so I get nothing south of me. Then to the east I have those nice mtns up towards ST J so I dont think thats going to fly. And Mt Mansfield Lets get serious LOL.
being in groton I have the mountains btw you and I walt so I get nothing south of me. Then to the east I have those nice mtns up towards ST J so I dont think thats going to fly. And Mt Mansfield Lets get serious LOL.jmcgee_jr said:Boy dont I know about what side of the hill
Jim, I thought you were switching to Charter or did I dream that?
waltinvt said:
Exactly, and that's just what has happened, everyone got all juiced up about a new receiver and crappy new HD lite channels, and just moved on to the newest thing. The problem with that is that they will not have any incentive to improve PQ as long as people accept it. We will pay higher and higher prices for substandard quality both in reception and content. I for one will invest my funds in HD DVD and get the quality I want.
Thank you for the kind words. This is a case where I wish I hadn't hit the nail quite so well but as time goes on, things are looking worse instead of better.
I expect more costly programming / hardware upgrade senerios to materialize soon and in fact (and I admit I'm stretching a bit here), wouldn't be surprised if more Dish receivers starting to act up too.
I expect more costly programming / hardware upgrade senerios to materialize soon and in fact (and I admit I'm stretching a bit here), wouldn't be surprised if more Dish receivers starting to act up too.
HokieEngineer said:
I have a question, how is the b/w diference between ESPN , ESPN2 HD and TNT HD. I mainly watch sports in HD, and TNT HD pixilates horribly when watching basketball when there is much movement. However, the ESPN channels look great no matter what sport. Noticed the NBA HD channels also look similar to TNT HD, as they have pretty bad pixilation. I'm assuming this is a bandwidth issue.
mzopinionated said:
1040P, where did you get the Idea that 1040p was a standard or the THE standard for HD.
720p and 1080i are the only HD Formats that are being used now. 1080P is a VERY LONG way off as a format that ANY Broadcaster is going to use.
John
